首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Symposium on Technologies for Homeland Security >Comparisons of Adaptive Automation Conditions for Single-Operator Multiple-Agent Control Systems
【24h】

Comparisons of Adaptive Automation Conditions for Single-Operator Multiple-Agent Control Systems

机译:单操作员多功能控制系统的自适应自动化条件的比较

获取原文

摘要

Autonomous systems provide tangible benefits in the field of human-computer interaction (HCI) by reallocating work from human operators to suitable machine substitutes. However, improper implementations of autonomy in HCI systems have led to dire consequences. As such, the expansion of autonomy in research and industry must be matched by solutions that properly balance the interaction between human and machine. Early human-computer teams relied on multiple human operators working with one or just a few complex machines. With the growth of technology and improved autonomy, however, this trend has gradually reversed in that multiple complex machines are now supervised and operated by individual human controllers. Past research suggests that simply increasing autonomy fails to address the imbalance between human and machine within a cooperative mission scenario. Instead, adaptive automation has been demonstrated to be a viable solution in balancing the degree of autonomy between human and machine. Previous studies have verified the existence of relationships between levels of autonomy, human cognition, and system performance. In the context of single-operator multiple-agent scenarios, adaptive systems allow the levels of automation to dynamically adapt to the needs of both the human and the machine. This research explores various methods of invoking adaptive automation that aims to balance the level of automation between the human and machine within a simulated multitasking scenario. As such, a military-inspired simulation was designed and implemented to compare the effects of different adaptation mechanisms on objective task performance and operator cognitive workload. Comparisons of four adaptation conditions support the use of adaptive automation as opposed to random or adaptable automation mechanisms for maintaining overall mission performance requirements. Results indicate increased operator utilization and situation awareness over time with decreased subjective workload scores in the adaptive conditions compared to the adaptable and random automation conditions.
机译:自主系统通过将人工人员的工作重新分配给合适的机器替代品,提供人机交互(HCI)领域的有形益处。然而,HCI系统中自主的不当实现导致了可怕的后果。因此,研究和工业中的自主性扩展必须通过正确平衡人与机器之间的相互作用的解决方案匹配。早期的人力计算机团队依靠多个人类运营商使用一个或只是几种复杂的机器。然而,随着技术的增长和改进的自主权,这种趋势逐渐逆转,因为多种复杂的机器现在由个别人类控制器监督和运营。过去的研究表明,简单地增加自主权未能在合作使命场景中解决人类和机器之间的不平衡。相反,自适应自动化已被证明是平衡人与机器之间的自主程度的可行解决方案。以前的研究已经验证了自主,人类认知水平与系统性能之间的关系。在单操作员多代理方案的背景下,自适应系统允许自动化级别动态适应人类和机器的需求。本研究探讨了调用自适应自动化的各种方法,该方法旨在在模拟的多任务场景中平衡人员和机器之间的自动化水平。因此,设计并实施了军事启发模拟,以比较不同适应机制对客观任务性能和操作员认知工作量的影响。四种适应条件的比较支持自适应自动化的使用,而不是随机或适应性自动化机制,以维持整体任务性能要求。结果表明,与适应条件下的主观工作量分数降低,与适应性和随机的自动化条件相比,随着时间的推移,运营商利用率和情况提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号