首页> 外文会议>eceee summer study on energy efficiency;European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy >The distribution of renewable energy policy cost amongst households in Germany – and the role of energy efficiency policies
【24h】

The distribution of renewable energy policy cost amongst households in Germany – and the role of energy efficiency policies

机译:可再生能源政策成本在德国家庭中的分布以及能源效率政策的作用

获取原文

摘要

We explore historical trends of household electricity pricesand consumption in Germany and show that, whilst priceshave risen, consumption has largely remained stable in the last16 years, indicating that the average household was not able tocompensate higher prices by reducing the amount of electricityconsumed. Data from the German Income and ExpenditureSurvey (EVS) is applied to the EEG surcharge to show its effecton different household types. We show that those groups withthe largest consumption of electricity often face the smallest relativeburden due to the EEG surcharge, as they can compensatewith their relatively large income. Groups with little discretionaryincome, such as low-income households, the unemployedand single parents face the highest relative burden, although theamounts they consume are not large in absolute terms.In light of our findings, we review the provisions relating toenergy expenditures in the German social security system. Wethen go on to examine the main energy efficiency policies thatare implemented and planned in Germany relating to buildingsand electricity consumption/appliances. Results indicatethat those policies do have the potential to reduce the burdenimposed by the EEG surcharge. Furthermore, the combinedeffect of the EEG surcharge and those policies turns out to benearly proportional. On the one hand, this shows that energyefficiency measures are not only relevant climate and energypolicy instruments, but can also serve distributional goals. Onthe other hand, we highlight that the result regarding their positivedistributional effects only holds if indeed these measuresare taken up also by low-income households. Therefore, it iscrucial to monitor the beneficiaries of energy efficiency measuresin the evaluation of these policies and if necessary designmore targeted approaches.
机译:我们探索家庭电价的历史趋势 和德国的消费量,并表明价格 上升,消费在过去基本上保持稳定 16年,表明普通家庭无法 通过减少电费来补偿较高的价格 消耗。来自德国收入和支出的数据 将调查(EVS)应用于EEG附加费以显示其效果 在不同的家庭类型上。我们证明那些与 用电量最大的地方通常面临最小的相对 由于脑电图附加费造成的负担,因为他们可以补偿 他们的收入相对较高。自由裁量权小的团体 收入,如低收入家庭,失业者 和单身父母面对的相对负担最大,尽管 从绝对角度看,他们消费的数量并不大。 根据我们的调查结果,我们审查了与 德国社会保障体系中的能源支出。我们 然后继续研究主要的能效政策, 在德国有关建筑物的实施和计划 和电力消耗/电器。结果表明 这些政策确实有可能减轻负担 由脑电图附加费征收。此外,结合 脑电附加费的影响,这些政策原来是 几乎成比例。一方面,这表明能量 效率措施不仅与气候和能源有关 政策工具,但也可以用于分配目标。在 另一方面,我们强调关于他们的积极结果 分配效应只有在这些措施确实存在的情况下才成立 也被低收入家庭占用。因此它是 监测节能措施的受益者至关重要 在评估这些政策时,并在必要时进行设计 更有针对性的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号