首页> 外文会议>ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping conference >COMPARISON OF HEAT INPUT METHODS IN WELDING RESIDUAL STRESS ANALYSIS
【24h】

COMPARISON OF HEAT INPUT METHODS IN WELDING RESIDUAL STRESS ANALYSIS

机译:焊接残余应力分析中热输入方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Welding residual stress simulation through finite element analysis is becoming increasingly common in fitness -for-service (FFS) assessments of pressurized equipment. The driving force for the residual stress is non-uniform thermal expansion and plastic strain due to drastic temperature gradients; with this in mind, proper heat transfer modeling is essential to meaningful mechanical predictions. The fundamental input to the heat transfer model is the welding arc power, which is commonly represented as an assigned triple Gaussian function (Goldak double ellipsoid model) or more simply, as a uniform temperature. These two methods are compared in detail, and conclusions drawn about the impact of the heat transfer modeling strategy on the predicted weld residual stress for two detailed cases. This evaluation finds particular significance when the welding power, or more particularly the welding energy per unit length, is used in an attempt to characterize a given weld.
机译:通过有限元分析进行焊接残余应力模拟在加压设备的适用性(FFS)评估中变得越来越普遍。残余应力的驱动力是由于温度梯度过大而引起的不均匀的热膨胀和塑性应变。考虑到这一点,正确的传热建模对于有意义的机械预测至关重要。传热模型的基本输入是焊接电弧功率,它通常表示为指定的三重高斯函数(Goldak双椭球模型),或更简单地表示为均匀温度。对这两种方法进行了详细的比较,并得出了关于传热建模策略对两种详细情况下的预测焊接残余应力的影响的结论。当使用焊接功率或更特别是每单位长度的焊接能量来试图表征给定的焊接时,该评估具有特别的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号