首页> 外文会议>PVP2011;ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping conference >THE BACKGROUND TO LIGHT WATER REACTOR ENVIRONMENT FATIGUE EVALUATION METHODS FOR AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL AND THEIR APPLICATION TO SAMPLE PRESSURISED WATER REACTOR COMPONENTS
【24h】

THE BACKGROUND TO LIGHT WATER REACTOR ENVIRONMENT FATIGUE EVALUATION METHODS FOR AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL AND THEIR APPLICATION TO SAMPLE PRESSURISED WATER REACTOR COMPONENTS

机译:奥氏体不锈钢轻质水反应堆环境疲劳评估方法的背景及其在样品加压水反应堆组件中的应用

获取原文

摘要

There is now a large amount of small cylindrical specimen test data, which indicates that in a Light Water Reactor (LWR) environment, compared to that in air, the fatigue life of stainless steel is significantly reduced. The current ASME III design fatigue curve does not explicitly include factors to account for a LWR environment. Using the available cylindrical specimen test data, methods for accounting for a LWR environment in fatigue assessments have been proposed in NuReg/CR-6909 and in two American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) code cases. One of the code cases (N-792) uses a penalty factor (F_(en)) approach, similar to that in NuReg/CR-6909, another (N-761) utilizes a set of environmentally corrected fatigue curves. A third code case, which is still under development, uses a flaw tolerance approach. In this paper the background to the methods for correcting for a LWR environment in fatigue calculations is presented. The safety margin present in the ASME fatigue design methodology is discussed and a short review of civil nuclear plant operating and geometrical features testing experience provided. The NuReg/CR-6909 and ASME code case N-761 methods are applied to a number of ASME III Class 1 austenitic stainless steel components, and the cumulative usage factors calculated compared with those obtained using the ASME 2007 design fatigue curve. An objective of the paper is to highlight some of the issues arising out of applying the newly proposed methods to reactor plant components.
机译:现在有大量的小圆柱试样测试数据,这表明在轻水反应堆(LWR)环境中,与空气相比,不锈钢的疲劳寿命显着降低。当前的ASME III设计疲劳曲线未明确包括用于说明轻水堆环境的因素。使用可用的圆柱试样测试数据,在NuReg / CR-6909和两个美国机械工程师协会(ASME)编码案例中,提出了在疲劳评估中考虑LWR环境的方法。一种代码案例(N-792)使用了惩罚因子(F_(en))方法,类似于NuReg / CR-6909中的方法,另一种代码案例(N-761)使用了一组经过环境校正的疲劳曲线。仍在开发中的第三种代码案例使用了一种容错方法。本文介绍了在疲劳计算中校正轻水堆环境的方法的背景。讨论了ASME疲劳设计方法中存在的安全裕度,并对民用核电厂的运行和几何特征测试经验进行了简短回顾。 NuReg / CR-6909和ASME代码案例N-761方法应用于许多ASME III 1级奥氏体不锈钢部件,并且与使用ASME 2007设计疲劳曲线得出的累积使用系数进行了比较。本文的目的是突出一些因将新提出的方法应用于反应堆工厂组件而引起的一些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号