首页> 外文会议>2011 IEEE Conference on Open Systems >A comparison and analysis of congestion window for HS-TCP, Full-TCP, and TCP-Linux in long term evolution system model
【24h】

A comparison and analysis of congestion window for HS-TCP, Full-TCP, and TCP-Linux in long term evolution system model

机译:长期演进系统模型中HS-TCP,Full-TCP和TCP-Linux拥塞窗口的比较和分析

获取原文

摘要

TCP performance over high bandwidth network still represents the major challenge, since the large numbers of data flows through bottleneck, TCP forces a high packet loss rate and that causing delays that users are likely to notice. Congestion window (cwnd) is maintained, which indicates the number of Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) segments that the existing connection is capable of holding safely. In high bandwidth networks, such as 4th Generation (4G) Long Term Evolution (LTE) systems, we expect a high rate of traffics, and then each TCP variants perform a different behavior of cwnd. In this study, three TCP's variants: TCP-Linux, FullTCP, and High Speed TCP (HSTCP), observed and the cwnd of each variant analyzed and compared with other two variants, over a model of high bandwidth network topology using network simulator (NS-2). All these TCP's tested under high rate of data transferred through a bottleneck. We found that each variant can provide a good cwnd size performance and stability but the differences was in cwnd phases such as slow start threshold (ssthresh), congestion avoidance, slow-start, and maximum congestion points.
机译:高带宽网络上的TCP性能仍然代表着主要挑战,因为大量数据流经瓶颈,因此TCP强制了很高的丢包率,并导致了用户可能会注意到的延迟。拥塞窗口(cwnd)得以维护,该窗口指示现有连接能够安全保存的传输控制协议(TCP)段的数量。在高带宽网络中,例如第4代(4G)长期演进(LTE)系统,我们期望高流量,然后每个TCP变体执行cwnd的不同行为。在这项研究中,观察了三个TCP的变体:TCP-Linux,FullTCP和高速TCP(HSTCP),并使用网络模拟器(NS)在高带宽网络拓扑模型上分析了每个变体的cwnd并与其他两个变体进行了比较-2)。所有这些TCP都在通过瓶颈传输的高数据速率下进行了测试。我们发现,每个变体都可以提供良好的cwnd大小性能和稳定性,但是在cwnd阶段存在差异,例如慢启动阈值(ssthresh),避免拥塞,慢启动和最大拥塞点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号