【24h】

Comparison and Study on Constitutive Models for Coarse Grained Materials under Different Stress Path

机译:不同应力路径下粗粒材料本构模型的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Combined with triaxial test data of coarse-grained material, rationality verification and study of constitutive model used commonly in earth dam indicates that Duncan's E-B model and SHEN Zhujiang's double-yield-surface model both well reflect the stress-strain relationship of pre-broken coarse-grained material under general triaxial test. Using general triaxial test parameters, deformation of coarse grain calculated under the path of equal stress ratio is done; whose decrease of volume strain and increase of shear strain is great difference compared with the experimental result. Nonlinear elastic model and Shen Zhujiang's double-yield-surface model could fit the result of triaxial test under equal stress ratio well when they are modified combined with the stress path of equal stress ratio, the main reason of great calculation error is that elastic parameters obtained by general triaxial experiment are applied to calculate them under complex stress path in high rockfill dam, by assuming the elastic parameters independence on stress path. Reasonable stress-strain constitutive model must reflect dam's real loading stress path objectively.
机译:结合粗粒材料的三轴试验数据,合理验证及对土坝常用本构模型的研究表明,邓肯的EB模型和沉珠江的双屈服面模型都很好地反映了预破碎粗颗粒的应力-应变关系。粒状材料经过一般的三轴试验。使用一般的三轴试验参数,在等应力比的路径下计算出了粗晶粒的变形。其体积应变的减小和剪切应变的增加与实验结果相差很大。非线性弹性模型和沉竹江双屈服面模型结合等应力比的应力路径进行修正后,可以很好地拟合等应力比下的三轴试验结果,计算误差大的主要原因是获得的弹性参数大。假定弹性参数与应力路径无关,通过一般的三轴试验计算高堆石坝复杂应力路径下的应力。合理的应力应变本构模型必须客观地反映大坝的实际荷载应力路径。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号