首页> 外文会议>International low impact development conference >Comparison of BMP Infiltration Simulation Methods
【24h】

Comparison of BMP Infiltration Simulation Methods

机译:BMP渗透模拟方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Prince George's County has developed a Best Management Practices Decision Support System (BMPDSS) to assist in assessing the effectiveness of Low Impact Development (LID) technologies. This module uses process-based algorithms to simulate BMP function and removal efficiency. The processes include weir and orifice outflow, flow and pollutant routing, evapotranspiration, infiltration, and a general loss/decay representation for a pollutant. Among these processes, infiltration is a key mechanism that controls the effectiveness of LID types of BMPs on both flow reduction and water quality improvement. Therefore, an accurate representation of the infiltration process is the basis of a successful BMP simulation module. The current version of BMPDSS employs the empirical Holtan-Lopez model. With the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's support, the model is currently being enhanced to include a layered infiltration scheme using the process-based Green-Ampt method. This paper compares the performance of these two different approaches for simulating the infiltration process occurring in LID types of BMPs like bioretention, vegetated buffer strip, and bio-swales. The pros and cons of each method are discussed in this paper.
机译:乔治王子县已制定了最佳管理实践决策支持系统(BMPDS),以协助评估低影响开发(盖子)技术的有效性。该模块使用基于过程的算法来模拟BMP功能和删除效率。该方法包括堰和孔口流出,流动和污染物路由,蒸发剂,渗透和污染物的一般损失/衰减表示。在这些过程中,渗透是一种关键机制,可控制盖子类型的BMP对流量减少和水质改善的有效性。因此,渗透过程的准确表示是成功的BMP仿真模块的基础。当前版本的BMPDSS采用了经验霍尔斯坦 - 洛佩兹模型。通过U. S.环境保护局的支持,目前正在增强模型,以包括使用基于过程的绿色AMPT方法的分层渗透方案。本文比较了这两种不同方法的性能,用于模拟盖子类型的BMP等渗透过程,如生物,植被缓冲条和生物洼地。本文讨论了各种方法的优缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号