首页> 外文会议>World environmental and water resources congress >Nutrient and Pathogen Removal in a Passive On-site Sewage Treatment and Disposal System (OSTDS) with a Recirculation Filtration Tank
【24h】

Nutrient and Pathogen Removal in a Passive On-site Sewage Treatment and Disposal System (OSTDS) with a Recirculation Filtration Tank

机译:带有循环过滤罐的被动式现场污水处理与处置系统(OSTDS)中的营养和病原去除

获取原文

摘要

Groundwater contamination due to the nutrients from a septic tank system is a vital concern in environmental health. Active OSTDS also know as on-site wastewater treatment is dependent on the use of pump to sustain the aerobic condition in the process and promote the nitrification which might not be sustainable in terms of energy saving. Experiments have been conducted over the past three years to find a cost-effective, passive on-site wastewater treatment process to improve nutrient removal. The inclusion of recirculation sand filter (RSF) might be a suitable intermediate process to trigger the proper nitrification/denitrification process between the septic tank and the drain field. This option may be adopted for these existing traditional septic tank systems as a retrofit project. Yet the science question as to how effectively the nitrification and denitrification can be fostered in an RSF remains unclear. Three types of medium: fine sand, course sand, and green sorption media (i.e. denoted as options 1, 2 & 3 in this study) were used to assess the performance of the RSF. In particular, phosphorus removal from the wastewater was one of the key concerns, and the capability of using limestone for phosphorus removal was also investigated and confirmed. It can be concluded that fine sand with limestone mixture had better performance for nutrient removal if clogging issue can be overcome by using a grinder pump when dosing. On average, the septic tank and RSF system with fine sand removal efficiencies were: 60.54% ammonium, 49.48% total Kjehldahl nitrogen (TKN), 42.57% total nitrogen (TN), 92.06% soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) and 87.16% total phosphorus (TP). The E. Coli removal efficiency by RSF was 99.9% in all cases. However, the addition of green sorption media is not favored due to insufficient hydraulic residence time (HRT). If the size of the RSF can be increased, the use of green sorption media in combination with limestone might be beneficial.
机译:化粪池系统养分中的养分造成的地下水污染是环境健康的关键问题。主动OSTDS也称为现场废水处理,这取决于使用泵来维持过程中的好氧条件并促进硝化作用,这在节能方面可能是不可持续的。在过去三年中进行了实验,以找到一种经济有效的被动式现场废水处理工艺,以改善营养去除率。包含再循环砂滤池(RSF)可能是触发化粪池与排水场之间适当的硝化/反硝化过程的合适中间过程。对于这些现有的传统化粪池系统,可将其作为改造项目采用。然而,关于在RSF中如何有效地促进硝化和反硝化的科学问题尚不清楚。三种类型的介质:细砂,粗砂和绿色吸附介质(即在本研究中表示为选项1、2和3)用于评估RSF的性能。特别地,从废水中去除磷是关键问题之一,并且还研究并证实了使用石灰石去除磷的能力。可以得出结论,如果在加药时使用砂轮泵可以解决堵塞问题,则细砂与石灰石混合物的脱氮效果会更好。平均而言,具有优良除砂效率的化粪池和RSF系统分别为:铵60.54%,凯氏氮(TKN)总量49.48%,总氮(TN)42.57%,可溶性活性磷(SRP)92.06%和总磷87.16% (TP)。在所有情况下,通过RSF去除大肠杆菌的效率均为99.9%。但是,由于水力停留时间(HRT)不足,因此不宜添加绿色的吸附介质。如果可以增加RSF的尺寸,则将绿色吸附介质与石灰石结合使用可能会有所帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号