【24h】

COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL AND SPACE SIMULATION APPROACHES TO PARTICLE PACKING IN CONCRETE

机译:混凝土颗粒填充实验与空间模拟方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Experimental investigations of cementitious materials are the wide-used methods forconcrete research field. But sometimes, they are time-consuming and condition limited.Production of computer-simulated concrete can reduce time and efforts bestowed onassessment of geometrical properties of material structure. Realistic representation of particledispersion is particularly relevant when the researcher is interested in aspects of materialperformance that rely on such material configuration characteristic. Conventional sequentialrandom (particle) addition (SRA) computer simulation systems are unsuitable in practicalterms to produce higher particle densities, and fundamentally incapable of producingcomputer-made-concrete (compucrete) with properly dispersed particles. In this paper,concurrent algorithm-based SPACE system's estimates for properties of concrete structurewith different configuration sensitivities are compared with experimental data and shown tobe quite similar. This proves SPACE-produced compucrete is suitable for investigations ofeven configuration-sensitive features of material structure.
机译:胶凝材料的实验研究是混凝土研究领域中广泛使用的方法。但是有时它们很耗时且条件有限。计算机模拟混凝土的生产可以减少评估材料结构的几何特性所需的时间和精力。当研究人员对依赖于这种材料构型特性的材料性能方面感兴趣时,颗粒分散的现实表示尤其重要。常规的顺序随机(粒子)加法(SRA)计算机模拟系统在实践上不适合产生更高的粒子密度,并且从根本上讲,无法生产具有适当分散的粒子的计算机制造的混凝土(计算机)。本文将基于并行算法的SPACE系统对结构敏感性不同的混凝土结构性能的估算结果与实验数据进行了比较,结果非常相似。这证明了SPACE生产的复合材料适用于研究材料结构的甚至对配置敏感的特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号