首页> 外文会议>International conference of the System Dynamics Society >Asymmetric commodity cycles: Evidence from an experimental market
【24h】

Asymmetric commodity cycles: Evidence from an experimental market

机译:大宗商品周期不对称:来自实验性市场的证据

获取原文

摘要

Laboratory experiments of commodity markets have used the Cobweb design to investigate market dynamics. The predicted cycles of the Cobweb theory did not occur. Arango (2006) adds complexity and realism to the Cobweb model and observes stronger fluctuations and autocorrelation. He shows that these fluctuations are quite symmetric and similar to the behaviour observed in one category of markets. However the fluctuations are different from the asymmetric price behaviour observed in other commodity markets. We hypothesise that asymmetries could be caused by non-linear demand, different from the linear demand curve used by Arango. Consequently we replicate his experiment using a demand structure with constant price elasticity and dynamic adjustment. Similar to Arango, the supply side is complicated by capacity lifetimes and investment delays across treatments. Compared to the previous results, this experiment gives rise to larger fluctuations and stronger asymmetries.
机译:商品市场的实验室实验已使用Cobweb设计来调查市场动态。蜘蛛网理论的预测周期没有发生。 Arango(2006)为Cobweb模型增加了复杂性和现实性,并观察到更强的波动性和自相关性。他表明,这些波动是相当对称的,并且与在一类市场中观察到的行为相似。但是,这种波动不同于其他商品市场中观察到的价格不对称行为。我们假设非对称性可能是由非线性需求引起的,与Arango使用的线性需求曲线不同。因此,我们使用具有恒定价格弹性和动态调整的需求结构来复制他的实验。与Arango相似,供应方由于产能寿命和各种处理的投资延迟而变得复杂。与以前的结果相比,该实验引起更大的波动和更强的不对称性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号