首页> 外文会议>Types for Proofs and Programs >On the Proofs of Some Formally Unprovable Propositions and Prototype Proofs in Type Theory
【24h】

On the Proofs of Some Formally Unprovable Propositions and Prototype Proofs in Type Theory

机译:关于类型理论中某些形式无法证明的命题和原型证明的证明

获取原文

摘要

The proof-theoretic investigation of Mathematics has been one of the major achievements of XX century Science: it gave us mathematical rigour and modern computing. The latter, its major fall-out, is changing our live. Yet, we need to go beyond its techniques and philosophy. First because, in view also of its successful paradigms, Mathematics has now reached a remarkable level of rigour and we are no longer scared of the novel geometric intelligibility of physical space, which originated Frege's "royal way out" from the "delirium" in Geometry (see [Tappenden95] for more on Frege's view). Second, because we may take advantage, also in computing, by an enlargement of our foundational paradigms, beyond the traditional linguistic-finitistic certitudes. In a sense, we should try to bring together the two "foundational ways" that split at the end of XIX century, as I tried to summarise in the introduction. In short, the foundation of Mathematics lies in: 1. Logic; 2. Formalisms; 3. Regularities of phenomenal space.
机译:数学的证明理论研究一直是20世纪科学的主要成就之一:它为我们提供了严格的数学和现代计算技术。后者的主要后果正在改变我们的生活。但是,我们需要超越其技术和哲学。首先,因为考虑到其成功的范例,数学现在已经达到了惊人的严谨水平,我们不再害怕物理空间的新颖几何可懂度,这是弗雷格从“几何学”中的“ del妄”产生的“皇家出路” (有关Frege的观点,请参见[Tappenden95])。其次,因为我们可以通过扩大基础范式来利用计算基础上的优势,从而超越传统的语言-极限主义观念。从某种意义上讲,正如我在引言中总结的那样,我们应该尝试将在十九世纪末分裂的两种“基础方式”结合在一起。简而言之,数学的基础在于:1.逻辑; 2.形式主义; 3.现象空间的规律性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号