【24h】

Field Xrf Analysis of Arsenic and Lead In Soils At a Former Smelter Facility

机译:前冶炼厂土壤中砷和铅的Xrf场分析

获取原文

摘要

Field X-ray fluorescence (XRF) chemical analyses were performed to efficiently and cost-effecitvely evaluate arsenic and lead concentrations in soils as part of CERCLA-driven remedial investigations at a former lead smelter. Sample preparation and analysis protocols, including extnesive quality control (QC) requirements, were developed for the field XRF method that were accepted by the United States Environmental Protection Agnecy and other regualtory agencies. over 800 soil samples from approxiamtely 150 borings and test pits were analyzed using the field XRF technique during a three-week period. Measured arsenic and lead concentrations ranged over several orders of magnitude. Costs for using the field XRF technique were about 60 to 70 percent of the costs for traditional wet chemistry (acid digestion and spectrophotometric analysis) methods, which were also used to analyze selected samples for verification. Split samples analyzed during and immediately after the field investigation showed a good correlation between soil concentrations obtained using field XRF methods and concentrations obtained using laboratory analysis (both XRF and wet chemistry). Correlation coefficients (r~2) for split samples compared using linear reression ranged from 0.832 to 0.995. Split-sample comparisons were generally better at lower soil concentrations (<10,000 ppm arsenic, <15,000 ppm lead). Duplicate, bland, and control standard resutls for hte field XRF method were within limits typically achieved by laboratory-based systems. Preparation study resutls suggested that increased levels of soil-sample prepartion may not significantl yimprove data comparability. Overall, results indicated that the field XRF technique is a dependable method for "screening-level" investigations in which solids are differentiated based on order-of-magnitude differences in arsenic and (or) lead concentrations. the field XRF method allowed rapid turnaround of analytical results while achieving data qulaity and comparability goals acceptable for a CERCLA remedial investigation.
机译:进行现场X射线荧光(XRF)化学分析,以有效和成本有效地评估土壤中砷和铅的浓度,这是由CERCLA驱动的在前铅冶炼厂进行的补救研究的一部分。针对现场XRF方法开发了样品制备和分析方案,包括广泛的质量控制(QC)要求,这些方案已被美国环境保护署和其他监管机构接受。在三周的时间内,使用现场XRF技术分析了大约150个钻孔和测试坑中的800多个土壤样品。测得的砷和铅浓度范围达几个数量级。使用现场XRF技术的成本约为传统湿化学方法(酸消解和分光光度分析)方法成本的60%至70%,这些方法还用于分析选定的样品以进行验证。在田间调查期间和之后立即进行分析的分割样本显示,使用田间XRF方法获得的土壤浓度与使用实验室分析(XRF和湿化学法)获得的浓度之间具有良好的相关性。使用线性回归进行比较时,分割样本的相关系数(r〜2)在0.832至0.995之间。在较低土壤浓度(砷<10,000 ppm,铅<15,000 ppm)的情况下,拆分样品的比较通常更好。现场XRF方法的重复,平淡和控制标准结果通常在基于实验室的系统通常能达到的范围内。准备研究结果表明,增加土壤样品前处理水平可能不会显着改善数据可比性。总体而言,结果表明,现场XRF技术是“筛选级”研究的可靠方法,其中,根据砷和(或)铅浓度的数量级差异来区分固体。 XRF现场方法可以快速完成分析结果,同时达到CERCLA补救研究可接受的数据质量和可比性目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号