首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics >Doctoral Consortium Proposal: : Biometrics as forensic evidence: some reflections from the Italian Criminal proceeding’s point of view
【24h】

Doctoral Consortium Proposal: : Biometrics as forensic evidence: some reflections from the Italian Criminal proceeding’s point of view

机译:博士联合体提案::将生物识别技术用作法医证据:从意大利刑事诉讼程序的角度进行的一些反思

获取原文

摘要

Biometric science is not free of errors, especially considering its typical statistical – probabilistic nature. The systematic use of biometric technologies in the Italian criminal proceeding could lead to some issues in terms of the reliability of the results from their application and the compatibility between the discipline in question, constitutional principles and typical procedural guarantees. However, because of the speed of the recent technology development, the criminal proceeding seems not to be able to do without the contribution offered by biometric science and the reason is that both the science and the trial, even with different approaches, have the different objective of the reconstruction of the causal connection. Biometric data have to be analyzed and evaluated in terms of scientific accuracy and it is necessary to understand their value case by case. The most crucial risks for forensic science in its recent digital dimension need to have legislative clarification aimed at standardising the discipline, also in terms of interpretability of technology, distinguishing one biometric data from another, implementing different applications since the specificity of each data element requires different legal solutions. Otherwise, the danger is that the procedural guarantees could be weakened (such as the principle of contradictory, the principle of reasonable duration of trial and the right of defence) in addition to some issues related to individual guarantees such as the right to privacy.
机译:生物识别科学并非没有错误,特别是考虑到其典型的统计-概率性质。在意大利的刑事诉讼中系统地使用生物识别技术可能会导致一些问题,例如应用生物识别技术的结果的可靠性以及所涉学科,宪法原则和典型程序保障之间的兼容性。但是,由于最近技术的发展速度,如果没有生物识别科学的贡献,刑事诉讼似乎是行不通的,原因是即使采用不同的方法,科学和审判都具有不同的目标。因果关系的重建。必须根据科学准确性对生物识别数据进行分析和评估,并且有必要逐案了解其价值。法医科学在其最近的数字维度中面临的最关键风险需要进行立法澄清,以规范该学科,同时还要从技术的可解释性,区分一种生物识别数据到另一种生物识别数据,实施不同的应用程序,因为每个数据元素的特异性要求不同法律解决方案。否则,除了一些诸如隐私权之类的与个人担保有关的问题外,还有可能削弱程序性担保(例如自相矛盾的原则,合理的审判期限和辩护权)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号