首页> 外文会议>TAGA annual technical conference >Color Quality Comparison of Electro-Photographic vs. Inkjet Printing Processes In a Color Managed Digital Printing Workflow (CMDPW)
【24h】

Color Quality Comparison of Electro-Photographic vs. Inkjet Printing Processes In a Color Managed Digital Printing Workflow (CMDPW)

机译:彩色管理数字印刷工作流程(CMDPW)中电子照相与喷墨印刷工艺的颜色质量比较

获取原文

摘要

n a quest to empower students to better understand the colorimetric attributes of color, this work will examine the industry standard printing process and quality management practices similar to those a student would encounter upon entering into the industry. Hence, for a student to consistently deliver a quality print, managing and controlling color from the input device to a multicolor output device is a major concern for the graphics and imaging educator. Analyzing the color image by examining its quantitative attributes eliminates the subjective judgment on color quality evaluation of printed colors or colors in nature. The quality of digital color printing is determined by these influential factors: screening method applied, type of printing process, ink (dry-toner or liquid-toner), and the substrate (paper). For this research, only the color attributes, such as: hue, gray balance, and overall color deviations will be analyzed to examine the significant differences that exist in the two digital printing processes, as these are the attributes which are monitored and managed for quality accuracy during the printing. Printed colorimetry of these two printing processes will be compared against ISO 12647-7 digital printing standards colorimetry to determine the color quality deviation or tolerances. The purpose of this experimental study is to determine the significant differences that exist among the printed primary colors hue (AH ) deviation [Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, and Black (CMYK)], overall average (AE) color (CMYKRGB) deviation and gray hue (overlap of CMY) deviation (AH) of the two printing processes, namely: Color Electro-photographic and Inkjet. The experiment will be conducted in a color managed digital printing workflow (CMDPW) to determine the significant differences that exist in the color quality of electro-photographic vs. inkjet printing, based on the colorimetric and statistical evaluation among two different types of printing processes. Each printing process in the experiment will be considered as a group, noted by letter "K" (K = 2). This study will focus on the measurement of color prints, printed on the same type of substrate (80 LBS. gloss coated paper) by using a color electro-photographic (color laser) printer and an inkjet printer. The following one-tailed non-directional multiple hypotheses are established for this study, because of the two independent groups of printers (groups, K = 2). A one-tailed non-directional hypothesis predicts the nature of the effect of the independent group on the dependent variable (or the color attribute as the outcome). Note: This manuscript was not received in time for publication in the 2018 TAG A Proceedings.
机译:为了使学生能够更好地理解颜色的比色属性,这项工作将研究行业标准的印刷过程和质量管理实践,类似于学生进入该行业时所遇到的情况。因此,对于学生来说,要始终如一地交付高质量的打印品,管理和控制从输入设备到多色输出设备的颜色是图形和成像教育者的主要问题。通过检查彩色图像的定量属性来分析彩色图像,消除了对打印的颜色或自然颜色的颜色质量评估的主观判断。数字彩色打印的质量取决于以下影响因素:所应用的筛选方法,打印过程的类型,墨水(干墨粉或液体墨粉)和基材(纸)。对于本研究,将仅分析颜色属性(例如:色相,灰度平衡和整体颜色偏差)以检查两个数字打印过程中存在的显着差异,因为这些属性是针对质量进行监控和管理的打印过程中的准确性。将这两种印刷过程的印刷色度与ISO 12647-7数字印刷标准色度进行比较,以确定颜色质量偏差或容差。本实验研究的目的是确定打印的原色(AH)偏差[青色,品红色,黄色和黑色(CMYK)],总体平均(AE)颜色(CMYKRGB)偏差和灰色之间存在的显着差异。两种打印过程的色相(CMY重叠)偏差(AH),即:彩色电子照相和喷墨。该实验将在色彩管理的数字印刷工作流程(CMDPW)中进行,以基于两种不同类型的印刷过程之间的比色和统计评估,确定电子照相与喷墨印刷的色彩质量之间存在的显着差异。实验中的每个打印过程都将视为一个组,以字母“ K”表示(K = 2)。这项研究将着重于通过使用彩色电子照相(彩色激光)打印机和喷墨打印机在相同类型的基材(80 LBS光泽涂层纸)上打印的彩色印刷品的测量。由于有两个独立的打印机组(组,K = 2),因此为该研究建立了以下单尾无方向多重假设。单尾无方向假设可预测独立组对因变量(或颜色属性作为结果)的影响的性质。注意:未及时收到该手稿,未在2018 TAG A会议录中发表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号