首页> 外文会议>International annual conference of the American Society for Engineering Management >ASSESSING SCORING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AWARD WINNERS AND NON-AWARD WINNERS FOR THE MALCOLM BALRIGE NATIONAL QUALITY AWARD
【24h】

ASSESSING SCORING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AWARD WINNERS AND NON-AWARD WINNERS FOR THE MALCOLM BALRIGE NATIONAL QUALITY AWARD

机译:评估马尔科姆·巴尔里格国家质量奖的获奖者和非获奖者之间的评分差异

获取原文

摘要

The Malcolm Baldrige Performance Excellence Model has proven to be a valuable tool for use by organizations interested in performance excellence. A form of it is used by almost all industrialized countries including Japan to improve on performance excellence in various sectors of the economy. The purpose of this research is to use the scoring data from a state program to investigate which categories show significant differences in scoring between those who win the award and those that do not. Fisher's Discriminant analysis is used to show that there is significant difference at a 0.05 significance level, between scores for all 7 criteria for award winners and those who do not win the award. The classification function resulted in a strong correlation coefficient of 0.82, with 87.5% and 100% true positive and true negative respectively. The result shows that scores for all 7 criteria play a significant role in winning an award.
机译:马尔科姆·鲍德里奇(Malcolm Baldrige)的卓越绩效模型已被证明是对卓越绩效感兴趣的组织使用的宝贵工具。它的一种形式被包括日本在内的几乎所有工业化国家所采用,用以改善经济各部门的卓越绩效。这项研究的目的是使用州立计划的评分数据来调查哪些类别在赢得奖项的人与未获奖者之间显示出明显的得分差异。 Fisher的判别分析用于表明,在所有7个获奖者标准和未获奖者的得分之间,显着性差异在0.05显着性水平上。分类函数得出的相关系数很强,为0.82,真正和真负分别为87.5%和100%。结果表明,所有7个标准的得分在赢得奖项中都起着重要作用。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号