首页> 外文会议>IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference >Performance evaluation of the approaches and algorithms using Hamburg Airport operations
【24h】

Performance evaluation of the approaches and algorithms using Hamburg Airport operations

机译:使用汉堡机场运营的方法和算法的性能评估

获取原文

摘要

The German Aerospace Center (DLR) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) have been independently developing and testing their own concepts and tools for airport surface traffic management. Although these concepts and tools have been tested individually for European and US airports, they have never been compared or analyzed side-by-side. This paper presents the collaborative research devoted to the evaluation and analysis of two different surface management concepts. Hamburg Airport was used as a common test bed airport for the study. First, two independent simulations using the same traffic scenario were conducted: one by the DLR team using the Controller Assistance for Departure Optimization (CADEO) and the Taxi Routing for Aircraft: Creation and Controlling (TRACC) in a real-time simulation environment, and one by the NASA team based on the Spot and Runway Departure Advisor (SARDA) in a fast-time simulation environment. A set of common performance metrics was defined. The simulation results showed that both approaches produced operational benefits in efficiency, such as reducing taxi times, while maintaining runway throughput. Both approaches generated the gate pushback schedule to meet the runway schedule, such that the runway utilization was maximized. The conflict-free taxi guidance by TRACC helped avoid taxi conflicts and reduced taxiing stops, but the taxi benefit needed be assessed together with runway throughput to analyze the overall performance objective.
机译:德国航空航天中心(DLR)和国家航空航天局(NASA)一直在独立开发和测试他们自己的用于机场地面交通管理的概念和工具。尽管这些概念和工具已经针对欧洲和美国机场进行了单独测试,但从未进行过并排比较或分析。本文提出了致力于评估和分析两种不同表面管理概念的合作研究。汉堡机场被用作该研究的通用试验场机场。首先,在相同的交通场景下进行了两次独立的模拟:一次是由DLR团队在实时模拟环境中使用离场优化控制器协助(CADEO)和飞机的滑行道:创建和控制(TRACC)进行的,以及这是由NASA团队在快速仿真环境中基于“现场和跑道离场顾问”(SARDA)进行的。定义了一组通用性能指标。仿真结果表明,这两种方法均在效率上带来了运营优势,例如减少滑行时间,同时又保持了跑道吞吐量。两种方法都会生成闸门后推进度表,以符合跑道进度表,从而使跑道利用率最大化。 TRACC的无冲突滑行指南有助于避免滑行冲突和减少滑行停靠点,但是需要将滑行收益与跑道吞吐量一起评估,以分析总体性能目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号