首页> 外文会议>World biomaterials congress >Using photodynamic therapy to combat bacterial biofilms and reduce infection on orthopaedic implants
【24h】

Using photodynamic therapy to combat bacterial biofilms and reduce infection on orthopaedic implants

机译:使用光动力疗法对抗细菌生物膜并减少骨科植入物的感染

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) is one of the greatest challenges to orthopaedics. The quoted rate for deep infection varies from 0.28% to 4% for a primary hip replacement, 0.39% to 3.9% for primary total knee replacement, and a higher incidence of infection in spinal implants . It is associated with high patient morbidity and has huge financial cost. Current treatments are long, invasive, and often ineffective. Increasing antibiotic resistance of microorganisms and the inefficacy of antibiotic treatment against biofilms on prosthetic implants means alternative treatments are needed. Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) is a known broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment providing rapid results with few systemic side effects and no bacterial resistance. It uses a photosensitiser that targets and kills bacterial cells following activation by an appropriate light source . This study investigates the use of PDT as a means of eradicating strains of bacteria that commonly cause prosthetic joint infections (methicillin sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), staphylococcus epidermidis, and pseudomonas aeruginosa both as planktonic culture and in a biofllm on titanium alloy and hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated titanium. Hypothesis: Photodynamic therapy is an effective means of eradicating common strains of bacteria that cause biofilms on orthopaedic implants. Methods: The concentration of the photosensitizer Methylene Blue (MB), and the laser power that was the most effective was determined using lawns of all bacteria in plate culture. Planktonic cultures of 4 bacteria grown in well-plates with4 treatment regimes - PDT (MB+L+), photo sensitizer alone (MB+L-), laser alone (MB-L+), and control (MB-L) using 0.3mM MB and 35jcm-2 laser. Following treatment the wells were analysed for the number of bacteria present using a standard serial dilution. Biofilms were formed for each of the 4 bacteria by placing titanium discs in bacterial suspension, which were oscillated and incubated for 3 days. The attached biofilms were treated (as per planktonic culture). Following treatment the discs were washed and sonicated to displace biofilm bacteria and standard serial dilution was performed to quantify remaining bacteria. This experiment was then repeated for P. aeruginosa biofilms on HA-coated discs Results: Staphylococci colony forming units were eradicated at the lowest strength of MB. With P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii, increasing the MB concentration had an improved bactericidal effect (Figure 1). The higher the power of the laser used in PDT the more bacteria were eradicated. Laser power ≥35 jcm-2 eradicated all bacterial colonies (figure2) but below this level there were slight differences in the susceptibility of different species. PDT had a significant bactericidal effect against planktonic MRSA and S. epidermidis compared to MB alone, laser alone, or the control. PDT was shown to have significantly higher bactericidal effects than MB alone or laser alone for all four strains of bacterial biofilms. For P. aeruginosa on HA-coated titanium discs, PDT was shown to have significantly higher bactericidal effects than photosensitiser alone, laser alone and the control however the effects of PDT were not as large as those seen with a titanium alloy surface (Figure 3). Discussion: This study demonstrates that PDT is an effective treatment for killing common gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria that cause PJI. It is effective not just for planktonic bacteria but bacteria within a biofilm on a prosthetic surface. Its speed of action and lack of bacterial resistance makes it an attractive therapy. The future challenge will be to find the optimal way of delivering this treatment.
机译:简介:假肢周围感染(PJI)是骨科的最大挑战之一。对于一次髋关节置换,深层感染的引用率在0.28%至4%之间,对于一次全膝关节置换术,其深层感染的引用率在0.39%至3.9%之间,并且在脊柱植入物中感染的发生率更高。它与高患者发病率相关并且具有巨大的财务成本。当前的治疗是长期的,侵入性的并且通常是无效的。微生物对抗生素的抵抗力不断增强,而对假体植入物上生物膜的抗生素治疗效率低下,这意味着需要其他治疗方法。光动力疗法(PDT)是已知的广谱抗菌药物,可提供快速的结果,几乎没有全身性副作用,并且没有细菌耐药性。它使用一种光敏剂,该光敏剂在适当的光源激活后靶向并杀死细菌细胞。这项研究调查了将PDT用作根除通常引起假体关节感染的细菌菌株的方法(对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA),耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA),表皮葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌都为浮游细菌,假设:光动力疗法是根除导致整形外科植入物上引起生物膜形成的常见细菌菌株的有效方法。最有效的激光功率是由平板培养中所有细菌的草坪确定的,在4种处理方案下,在多孔板上生长的4种细菌的浮游细菌培养-PDT(MB + L +),仅光敏剂(MB + L-),激光单独使用(MB-L +)和对照(MB-L)分别使用0.3mM MB和35jcm-2激光进行处理。进行标准系列稀释。通过将钛圆盘置于细菌悬液中,对4种细菌中的每一种形成生物膜,将其振荡并温育3天。处理附着的生物膜(按照浮游文化)。处理后,将圆盘洗涤并超声处理以置换生物膜细菌,并进行标准系列稀释以定量残留细菌。然后对HA涂布的圆盘上的铜绿假单胞菌生物膜重复该实验。结果:以最低的MB强度消除了葡萄球菌菌落形成单位。对于铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌,提高MB浓度具有改善的杀菌效果(图1)。 PDT中使用的激光功率越高,消灭的细菌越多。 ≥35 jcm-2的激光功率消灭了所有细菌菌落(图2),但低于此水平,不同物种的药敏性略有不同。与单独的MB,单独的激光或对照相比,PDT对浮游性MRSA和表皮葡萄球菌具有显着的杀菌作用。对于所有四种细菌生物膜菌株,PDT被证明比单独使用MB或单独使用激光具有更高的杀菌效果。对于HA涂层钛圆片上的铜绿假单胞菌,PDT具有比单独使用光敏剂,单独使用激光和对照显着更高的杀菌作用,但是PDT的作用不如在钛合金表面上看到的那么大(图3) 。讨论:这项研究表明,PDT是杀死引起PJI的常见革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性细菌的有效方法。它不仅对浮游细菌有效,而且对假体表面生物膜内的细菌有效。它的作用速度快且缺乏细菌抵抗力,使其成为一种有吸引力的疗法。未来的挑战将是找到提供这种治疗的最佳方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号