首页> 外文会议>IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction >Non-response, Social Exclusion, and False Acceptance: Gatekeeping Tactics and Usability Work in Free-Libre Open Source Software Development
【24h】

Non-response, Social Exclusion, and False Acceptance: Gatekeeping Tactics and Usability Work in Free-Libre Open Source Software Development

机译:非反应,社会排除和虚假验收:在自由自由自由开源软件开发中的网守策略和可用性工作

获取原文

摘要

Usability is an important aspect of Free-Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS), but barriers exist for usability specialists' participation in such projects. Organizational boundary literature is interested in the tensions of online communities, including FLOSS communities. While this literature recognizes the importance of managing boundaries in online communities, little empirical research has been conducted on actual gatekeeping tactics project members perform against outsiders' contributions. Based on several years of engaged research with FLOSS projects, we characterize three gatekeeping tactics in FLOSS projects: non-response, social exclusion, and false acceptance. They all have hindered usability work. We also offer examples of usability specialists and their contributions succeeding in avoiding these gatekeeping tactics in FLOSS projects. This paper provides an important contribution to the boundary management literature through detailed examination of gatekeeping tactics in action, as well as to the Human Computer Interaction literature interested in contributing to FLOSS projects through usability work.
机译:可用性是自由自由的开源软件(牙线)的一个重要方面,但可用性专家参与此类项目的障碍。组织边界文学对在内的在线社区的紧张局势感兴趣,包括牙线社区。虽然这种文献认识到在在线社区中管理界限的重要性,但在实际的良住策略项目成员对局外人的贡献进行了很少的实证研究。基于几年的牙线项目的从事研究,我们在牙线项目中表征了三个纳便器策略:非反应,社会排斥和虚假接受。他们都阻碍了可用性工作。我们还提供可用性专家的示例及其在避免这些牙线项目中避免这些守门策略的贡献。本文通过详细审查行动内部策略以及对通过可用工作促进牙线项目的人力计算机互动文献提供了对边界管理文献的重要贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号