首页> 外文会议>IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things >Experimental evaluation of alternative congestion control algorithms for Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
【24h】

Experimental evaluation of alternative congestion control algorithms for Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)

机译:替代拥塞控制算法的实验评价约束应用协议(CAAP)

获取原文

摘要

The wide range of IoT applications creates a demand for various types of communication. While both types of communication, unreliable and reliable, are important, it is crucial to extend scalable congestion control in the Internet to cover IoT communication also. Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP), a web transfer protocol for constrained devices and networks proposed by Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), has optional reliability based on retransmission timeout (RTO) together with exponential RTO backoff to implement a simple basic congestion control mechanism. While the CoAP basic congestion control is simple, it is relatively conservative and potentially inefficient. Hence, there is a need for a more efficient congestion control alternative and CoCoA has been proposed as an option. In this paper we experimentally evaluate the efficiency and scalability of alternative congestion control algorithms for CoAP, including CoCoA and two TCP-based mechanisms. Our results show that while all the alternatives are scalable, they are more aggressive than the default congestion control mechanism of CoAP resulting in more efficient operation particularly at higher congestion level(s).
机译:各种IOT应用程序为各种类型的通信创造了需求。虽然这两种类型的通信,不可靠且可靠,很重要,但在互联网中扩展可扩展拥塞控制也至关重要,以覆盖物联网通信。受限应用协议(CAAP),用于由因特网工程任务组(IETF)提出的受限设备和网络的Web传输协议,基于重传超时(RTO)以及指数RTO退避的可选可靠性,以实现简单的基本拥塞控制机制。虽然COAP基本拥塞控制很简单,但它相对保守和潜在效率低下。因此,需要一种更有效的拥塞控制替代方案,并且已经提出了可可作为一种选择。在本文中,我们通过实验评估替代拥塞控制算法的效率和可扩展性,包括Cocoa和两种基于TCP的机制。我们的研究结果表明,虽然所有替代品都是可扩展的,但它们比默认拥塞控制机制更具侵略性,导致更有效的操作,特别是在更高的拥塞水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号