首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >Applicability of ASHRAE Standard 55 and EN 15251 Adaptive Thermal Comfort Models in Hot-and-Humid Climate
【24h】

Applicability of ASHRAE Standard 55 and EN 15251 Adaptive Thermal Comfort Models in Hot-and-Humid Climate

机译:Ashrae标准55和EN 15251在热湿润气候中的适用性热舒适模型的适用性

获取原文

摘要

Background: The inclusion of adaptive thermal comfort model in the ASHRAE Standard 55 and EN 15251 exemplifies the increasing effort of improving indoor environmental quality in naturally ventilated buildings. However the applicability of these models in areas of hot-and-humid climate such as Taiwan has been only insufficiently validated. Aims: This study examined the boundaries of thermal comfort zones as predicted by the ASHRAE and EN models to those established by a field study conducted in Taiwan to examine the discrepancies between these models as well as between the model projection and field observation so to evaluate the models' local applicability. Methods: A field study was conducted to investigate the adaptive thermal comfort in 113 naturally ventilated classrooms of 14 schools in central Taiwan. For a.total period of five months consisting of summer, autumn and winter conditions, questionnaire survey were performed to observe the actual thermal sensation of the students in relation to the thermal status in the ambient environment when the school was in session. The observed thermal acceptability was analyzed against those projected by the ASHRAE and EN models using local meteorological data. Results: Both the ASHRAE and EN models significantly underestimated the thermal acceptability of Taiwanese when the ambient temperature fell outside the range of approximately 20 to 30oC. When the upper limit of the comfort zones projected by these models was compared, the predictability of the ASHRAE model appeared to be less than that of the EN model in the warm condition. The EN comfort zones Category Ⅰ and Ⅱ were more consistent to field observations than the ASHRAE comfort zones 90 and 80%. Conclusions: When applied to specific regions the ASHRAE and EN adaptive comfort models should be first assessed for applicability and calibrated to accommodate regional differences in climate and in patterns of thermal adaptation.
机译:背景:在ASHRAE标准55和EN 15251中包含自适应热舒适模型举例说明了在天然通风建筑物中提高室内环境质量的努力。然而,这些模型在台湾的热湿度和潮湿的气候区域的适用性仅被验证不够。目的:本研究检测了Ashrae和EN模型预测的热舒适区的界限,通过在台湾进行的田间研究建立的那些,以检查这些模型之间的差异以及模型投影和现场观察,以便评估模型的本地适用性。方法:进行了田间研究,以研究台湾14所学校113个自然通风课堂的自适应热舒适度。对于夏季,秋季和冬季条件组成的五个月的一个,秋季和冬季条件组成,在学校参加时,进行了调查问卷调查,以观察学生与环境环境中的热状况相关的实际热敏感觉。使用局部气象数据对由Ashrae和EN模型进行的观察到的热可接受性进行分析。结果:ASHRAE和EN模型都显着低估了台湾时的热可接受性,当环境温度下降约2​​0至30℃时。当比较由这些模型投射的舒适区的上限时,ASHRAE模型的可预测性似乎小于温暖条件下的ZH模型的可预测性。 EN舒适区类别Ⅰ和Ⅱ比ASHRAE舒适区90和80%更符合现场观察。结论:应用于特定区域时,应首先评估Ashrae和EN自适应舒适模型,以适应和校准,以适应气候和热适应模式的区域差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号