首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >A Structural Approach to Analyzing Occupational Cohorts: The Healthy-Worker Survivor Effect and an Application in the Trucking industry Cohort
【24h】

A Structural Approach to Analyzing Occupational Cohorts: The Healthy-Worker Survivor Effect and an Application in the Trucking industry Cohort

机译:一种分析职业队列的结构方法:健康工人幸存者效应及其在卡车运输行业队列中的应用

获取原文

摘要

Background: Occupational cohort studies are often challenged by the presence of the Healthy Worker Survivor Effect (HWSE). While standard methods of analysis may be biased in the presence of HWSE, g-estimation of structural failure time models has been proposed as an alternative for reducing bias due to time-varying confounding by a variable affected by prior exposure. Aim: We assess the effect of years worked in specific jobs in the trucking industry on mortality, using a Structural Cumulative Failure Time Model (SNCFTM), to adjust for time-varying confounding. We also apply a Structural Accelerated Failure Time Model (SNAFTM) and compare both g-estimation results to results from standard Cox proportional hazards models. Methods: We used g-estimation of a SNCFTM to assess the effect of major job titles in the trucking industry on total and ischemic heart disease (IHD) mortality, in 30, 758 males employed in the unionized U.S trucking industry in 1985. Exposure was defined based on detailed work records. We also applied g-estimation of a SNAFTM and standard Cox proportional hazards models. The time-varying health surrogate was time taken off work. Results: The Risk Ratio obtained from the SNCFTM for total mortality comparing the risk had everyone been exposed as a Long-Haul Driver for the duration of follow up to the risk had nobody been exposed was 1.42 (95% CI: 1.16 -1.77), and the RR for IHD mortality was 1.39 (95%: 1.01 - 2.09). SNAFTM and SNCFTM Hazard Ratio (HR) approximations were similar, but HRs from Cox proportional hazards models were lower. Conclusions: Effect estimates from the SNCFTM and SNAFTM indicate a higher all cause and IHD mortality risk for Long-Haul Drivers than Cox models. Thisdifference may partially reflect better control for the HWSE by the structural models. Structural failure time models may be useful in the analysis of occupational survival data and provide additional advantages compared to standard methods.
机译:背景:职业队列研究通常受到健康工人幸存者效应(HWSE)的挑战。虽然在存在HWSE的情况下标准的分析方法可能会产生偏差,但已提出结构失效时间模型的g估计作为减少偏差的替代方法,该偏差是由于受先前暴露影响的变量随时间变化造成的混杂而造成的。目的:我们使用结构累积失效时间模型(SNCFTM)来评估随时间变化造成的混淆,从而评估卡车行业在特定工作中工作年限对死亡率的影响。我们还应用了结构加速故障时间模型(SNAFTM),并将两种g估计结果与标准Cox比例风险模型的结果进行比较。方法:我们使用SNCFTM的g估计来评估1985年美国工会联合卡车业中30名758名男性中卡车业的主要工作职位对总死亡率和缺血性心脏病(IHD)死亡率的影响。根据详细的工作记录进行定义。我们还应用了SNAFTM和标准Cox比例风险模型的g估计。时变的健康替代品是下班时间。结果:从SNCFTM获得的总死亡率的风险比是1.42(95%CI:1.16 -1.77),该风险比是将所有人在随访期间的所有人暴露为长期驾驶员而没有暴露的风险。 IHD死亡率的RR为1.39(95%:1.01-2.09)。 SNAFTM和SNCFTM危险比(HR)近似值相似,但来自Cox比例危险模型的HRs较低。结论:SNCFTM和SNAFTM的效果估计表明,长途驾驶员的全因病和IHD死亡风险比Cox模型高。这种差异可能部分反映了结构模型对HWSE的更好控制。与标准方法相比,结构失效时间模型可能对职业生存数据的分析有用,并提供了其他优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号