首页> 外文会议>Transportation Research Board Annual meeting >MODELS FOR ANTICIPATING NON-MOTORIZED TRAVEL CHOICES, AND THE ROLE OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
【24h】

MODELS FOR ANTICIPATING NON-MOTORIZED TRAVEL CHOICES, AND THE ROLE OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT

机译:预测非机动化旅行选择的模型以及内置环境的作用

获取原文

摘要

This paper uses detailed travel data from the Seattle metropolitan area to evaluate theeffects of built-environment variables on the use of non-motorized (bike + walk) travel modes.Several model specifications are used to understand and explain non-motorized travel behaviorin terms of household, person and built-environment (BE) variables. Marginal effects ofcovariate effects for models of vehicle ownership levels, intrazonal trip-making, destination andmode choices, non-motorized trip counts per household, and miles traveled (both motorized andnon-motorized) are presented. Mode and destination choice models were estimated separately forinterzonal and intrazonal trips and for each of three different trip purposes, to recognize thedistinct behaviors at play when making shorter versus longer trips and serving differentactivities.The results underscore the importance of street connectivity (quantified as the number of3-way and 4-way intersections in a half-mile radius), higher bus stop density, and greater nonmotorizedaccess in promoting lower vehicle ownership levels (after controlling for householdsize, income, neighborhood density and so forth), higher rates of non-motorized trip generation(per day), and higher likelihoods of non-motorized mode choices. Intrazonal trip likelihoods rosewith street connectivity, transit availability, and land use mixing.Across all BE variables tested, street structure offered the greatest predictive benefits,alongside accessibility indices (for both motorized and non-motorized access). For example,non-motorized trip counts are estimated to rise 7% following a 1% increase in this variable, andwalk probabilities by 27% following a one standard deviation increase in this index at thedestination zone. Regional and local accessibility and density (of population plus jobs) variableswere also important, depending on response being modeled. Simulated model applicationsilluminate when and to what extent significant travel behavior changes may be witnessed, as landuse settings and other variables are changed.
机译:本文使用西雅图市区的详细旅行数据来评估 内置环境变量对非机动(自行车+步行)出行方式使用的影响。 几种模型规格用于理解和解释非机动出行行为 在家庭,人和建筑环境(BE)变量方面。的边际效应 车辆所有权水平,区域内出行,目的地和目的地的模型的协变量效应 模式选择,每户非机动出行次数和行驶里程(机动和 非机动化)。模式和目的地选择模型分别针对 区域间和区域内旅行,以及针对三个不同旅行目的的每一个,以识别 在进行短途旅行或长途旅行并提供不同服务时表现出不同的行为 活动。 结果强调了街道连通性的重要性(量化为 半英里半径内的3路和4路交叉路口),更高的公交车站密度和更大的非机动车道 促进降低汽车拥有量水平(控制住户之后) 规模,收入,社区密度等),非机动出行的发生率更高 (每天),以及非机动模式选择的可能性更高。区域内旅行的可能性增加 街道连通性,交通便利性和土地用途混合。 在所有测试的BE变量中,街道结构可提供最大的预测收益, 以及可访问性索引(用于自动和非自动访问)。例如, 在此变量增加1%之后,非机动出行次数估计会增加7%,并且 在该指标处,该指标增加一个标准偏差后,步行概率提高了27% 目标区域。区域和地方的可及性和(人口加工作的)人口密度 也很重要,具体取决于要建模的响应。模拟模型应用 阐明何时以及在多大程度上可以目睹出行行为发生重大变化,例如陆地 使用设置和其他变量被更改。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号