首页> 外文会议>Transportation Research Board Annual meeting >Transportation, Location, and Subjective Well-Being
【24h】

Transportation, Location, and Subjective Well-Being

机译:交通,位置和主观幸福感

获取原文

摘要

Promoting access—by increasing proximity to opportunities and providing transportationresources—is a fundamental goal of urban planning. However, there has been little study of howaccess contributes to individuals' evaluation of their quality of life, or subjective well-being(SWB). This study utilizes data from the Gallup/Healthways Well-Being Index, a survey on abroad range of topics including SWB. I added questions about transportation. Moreover, Imerged in much data on subjects' locations. I utilize OLS regression and find that, all else equal,the important contributors to SWB are age (SWB highest in the young and old), physical health(+), emotional health (+), income and wealth (+), female gender (+), employment (theunemployed are least happy), social time (+), religiosity (+), and Hispanic or African-Americanethnicity (+). These relationships are in line with the literature. Transportation resources,including the ability to walk, vehicle ownership, and location near a rail transit station arepositively and significantly associated with SWB. However, characteristics of the metropolitanarea transportation system (including freeway congestion) are not significant. Proximity is lessimportant than transportation. Subjects' distances from the nearest central business district andthe presence of nearby jobs and shopping have little measurable relationship with SWB. Localpopulation density is negatively associated with SWB. The presence of leisure and culturalactivities in subjects' metropolitan area is not related to SWB, calling into question the accessbenefits of big city life. The general lack of significance for location-related variables suggeststhat physical surroundings are of limited import.
机译:通过增加与机会的接近度和提供交通来促进访问 资源-是城市规划的基本目标。但是,关于如何 访问有助于个人对其生活质量或主观幸福感的评估 (SWB)。这项研究利用了盖洛普(Gallup)/健康之路(Healthways)幸福感指数中的一项数据 广泛的主题,包括SWB。我添加了有关运输的问题。而且,我 合并了有关对象位置的大量数据。我利用OLS回归发现,在其他所有条件下, SWB的重要贡献者是年龄(SWB在年轻人和老年人中最高),身体健康 (+),情绪健康(+),收入和财富(+),女性(+),就业( 失业者最不开心),社交时间(+),宗教信仰(+)和西班牙裔或非裔美国人 种族(+)。这些关系与文献一致。交通资源 包括步行能力,车辆拥有权以及在铁路车站附近的位置 与SWB积极且显着相关。但是,都市的特征 区域交通系统(包括高速公路拥堵)并不重要。邻近度较小 比运输重要。受试者距最近的中央商务区的距离以及 附近工作和购物的存在与SWB几乎没有可测量的关系。当地的 人口密度与SWB负相关。休闲文化的存在 受试者所在城市的活动与SWB无关,这对访问权限提出了疑问 大城市生活的好处。一般而言,与位置相关的变量缺乏意义,这表明 实际环境的重要性有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号