首页> 外文会议>International astronautical congress >'Space Law - Future Challenges and Potential Solutions'. Examining Past International Space Law in order to Determine the Future of International Space Law: Learning from History'
【24h】

'Space Law - Future Challenges and Potential Solutions'. Examining Past International Space Law in order to Determine the Future of International Space Law: Learning from History'

机译:“空间法-未来的挑战和潜在的解决方案”。审查过去的国际空间法,以确定国际空间法的未来:向历史学习”

获取原文

摘要

The future of space law is heavily reliant on the future of international relations between major space faring states. This is especially true of arms control law in outer space. The lack of solid foundations in the arms control provisions within the major outer space treaties undermines the future development of arms control law in outer space. The arms control provisions within the Outer Space Treaty 1967 (OST 67) and the Moon Treaty 1979 (MT 79) are not the solid pillars of international law which they might have been if they had been negotiated in a context other than that of the Cold War. The three core ambiguities within the arms control provisions of these treaties are (1) demarcation, (2) the definition of peaceful purposes/uses and (3) the definition of aggression. Cold War superpower tensions in international relations directly impacted on the utility of the arms control provisions of the above treaties reducing them to the level of proverbial paper tigers. New Zealand restricted archival material, including key points within the negotiations between the superpowers, is presented to demonstrate why the above treaties are lacking in utility. The future development of space law remains to be determined. An understanding of the reasons for the limited utility and significant ambiguities within the above treaties is necessary in order to face the challenges of future treaty development. Such challenges include new and emerging states utilising outer space for the first time, the activities of which may cause insecurity to the already established space-faring states. This paper also analyses the arms control provisions within the draft Treaty on the Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer Space, the Threat or Use of Force against Outer Space Objects (PPWT 2008). PPWT 2008 as proposed faces significant challenges which will be discussed. Possible solutions are presented in the dual contexts of international relations and security. Potential solutions for the security dilemma in outer space depend upon a sound understanding of the past, especially that of Cold War and post Cold War developments, and the same is true of space law. In order to develop effective future space law, the lessons of history must first be learned.
机译:太空法的未来在很大程度上取决于主要太空国家之间国际关系的未来。对于外层空间的军备控制法则尤其如此。主要外空条约中的军备控制规定缺乏扎实的基础,破坏了外空军备控制法的未来发展。 1967年《外层空间条约》(OST 67)和《 1979年月球条约》(MT 79)中的军备控制规定不是国际法的坚实基础,如果在冷战之外的其他环境中进行谈判,它们本来可以成为国际法的坚实基础战争。这些条约的军备控制规定内的三个核心歧义是:(1)划界;(2)和平目的/用途的定义;(3)侵略的定义。冷战中国际关系中的超级大国紧张局势直接影响了上述条约的军备控制规定的适用性,使它们减少到了众所周知的纸老虎的水平。介绍了新西兰限制的档案材料,包括超级大国之间谈判的重点,以说明为什么上述条约缺乏效用。空间法的未来发展仍有待确定。为了应对未来条约发展的挑战,有必要了解上述条约中效用有限和明显歧义的原因。这些挑战包括新兴国家和新兴国家首次利用外层空间,其活动可能会给已经建立的航天国家造成不安全感。本文还分析了《防止在外层空间放置武器,对外层空间物体施加威胁或使用武力的条约草案》(PPWT 2008)中的军备控制规定。拟议的PPWT 2008面临重大挑战,将进行讨论。在国际关系与安全的双重背景下提出了可能的解决方案。解决外层空间安全困境的潜在解决方案取决于对过去的深刻理解,尤其是对冷战和冷战后发展的透彻理解,而空间法也是如此。为了制定有效的未来空间法,必须首先学习历史教训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号