首页> 外文会议>Third International Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation >Affect of Different Preprocessing Methods on Principal Component Analysis for Soil Classification
【24h】

Affect of Different Preprocessing Methods on Principal Component Analysis for Soil Classification

机译:不同预处理方法对土壤分类主成分分析的影响

获取原文

摘要

Fast classification of soil with different texture is essential for site-specific application of different inputs into farmland. Total 203 soil samples with five textures were collected from Silsoe Experimental Farm, Cranfield University, England. Using a Vis/NIR spectrophotometer (Tech5, Germany), spectra of soil samples were recorded for the study. Amongst the pre-processing methods, smoothing with moving average(MA), multiplicative scatter correction(MSC), standard normal variation(SNV), de-trending(DT), baseline correction(BC) and derivatives( 1st and 2nd ) were mainly investigated. PCA was applied for evaluation of the efficiency of different pre-processing methods on soil spectra. The sore plot of PCs shows that 1st derivative can help separate all textures much more effective than other methods. According to the cumulative variance of first 8 PCs, the various combinations of MA, MSC, DT and BC can be regarded as good methods. The worst is 2nd derivative due to its inducing much more noise. The study suggests that 1st derivatives should be firstly concerned amongst various pre-processing methods for the classification of soil textures.
机译:对具有不同质地的土壤进行快速分类,对于在农田中不同投入的特定地点应用至关重要。从英格兰克兰菲尔德大学的Silsoe实验农场收集了总共203种五种质地的土壤样品。使用Vis / NIR分光光度计(德国Tech5)记录土壤样品的光谱以供研究。在预处理方法中,主要采用移动平均(MA),乘法散射校正(MSC),标准正态变化(SNV),去趋势(DT),基线校正(BC)和导数(第一和第二)进行平滑。调查。 PCA用于评估不同预处理方法对土壤光谱的效率。 PC的痛点图表明,一阶导数可以比其他方法更有效地帮助分离所有纹理。根据前8台PC的累积方差,可以将MA,MSC,DT和BC的各种组合视为好方法。最差的是二阶导数,因为它会产生更多的噪声。研究表明,在土壤质地分类的各种预处理方法中,应首先考虑一阶导数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号