首页> 外文会议>IEEE international conference on advanced management science;IEEE ICAMS 2010 >Do The Journals Prefer Positive Results?A Study on the Publication Bias of CSR and CFP Relationship in China
【24h】

Do The Journals Prefer Positive Results?A Study on the Publication Bias of CSR and CFP Relationship in China

机译:期刊是否偏爱正面结果?中国企业社会责任与CFP关系的出版偏向研究

获取原文

摘要

The relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate financial performance (CFP) has become one of the most controversial topic in Chinese management studies. However, there is no agreeable conclusion about this issue in spite of many relative published papers. This article aims to find out the truth of CSR and CFP relationship and examine whether extant studies are reliable without publication bias. The meta-analysis including 34 Chinese empirical research papers shows that the two are positively correlated. Publication bias tests using multiple methods such as funnel plot, Begg's rank and Egger's regression method, fail-safe N etc., indicate that the conclusion is valid without obvious publication bias. Thus the argument that the relationship between CSR and CFP is positive proves to be not only objective but also universal. That is to say, CSR also pays off in the Chinese context.
机译:企业社会责任(CSR)与企业财务绩效(CFP)之间的关系已成为中国管理研究中最具争议的话题之一。但是,尽管有许多相关的已发表论文,但对这个问题尚无一个令人满意的结论。本文旨在找出CSR和CFP关系的真相,并检验现有研究是否可靠而没有发表偏见。包含34篇中国实证研究论文的荟萃分析表明,两者呈正相关。使用漏斗图,Begg秩和Egger回归方法,故障保险N等多种方法进行的发布偏倚测试表明,该结论是有效的,没有明显的发布偏倚。因此,CSR与CFP之间的关系是积极的论据被证明不仅是客观的,而且是普遍的。也就是说,企业社会责任在中国也有回报。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号