The linear curve fitting methods such as the Hvorslev method and the Bouwer and Rice method provide a rapid and simple means to analyze slug test data for estimating in-situ hydraulic conductivity (k) of geologic material. However, when analyzing a slug test in a relatively compressible aquifer, these methods have difficulties to fit a straight line to the semilogarithmic plot of the test data that shows a concave-upward curvature because the linear curve fitting methods ignore the role of the compressibility or specific storage (Ss) of an aquifer. The comparison of the Hvorslev method and the Bouwer and Rice method is made for a partiallypenetrating well geometry to show analytically that the Hvorslev method estimates higher hydraulic conductivity than the Bouwer and Rice method except that the well intake section locates very close to the bottom of the aquifer. The effect of fitting a straight line to the slug test data is evaluated along with the dimensionless compressibility parameter (α) ranging from 0.001 to 1.
展开▼
机译：线性曲线拟合方法（例如Hvorslev方法以及Bouwer和Rice方法）提供了一种快速简便的方法来分析段塞测试数据，以估算地质材料的现场水导率（k）。但是，当在相对可压缩的含水层中分析段塞测试时，这些方法很难将直线拟合到显示凹向上曲率的测试数据的半对数图，因为线性曲线拟合方法忽略了可压缩性或可压缩性的作用。含水层的特定存储（Ss）。通过对Hvorslev方法与Bouwer和Rice方法的比较，对部分渗透的井眼进行了几何分析，以分析表明，Hvorslev方法比Bouwer and Rice方法估计的水力传导率更高，只是井口的入口位置非常靠近底部。含水层。评估将直线拟合到段塞测试数据的效果以及范围为0.001到1的无量纲可压缩性参数（α）。
展开▼
