首页> 外文会议>Joint China/Japan chemical engineering symposium;CJCES >A preliminary comparison between BW reverse osmosis membrane and SW reverse osmosis membrane
【24h】

A preliminary comparison between BW reverse osmosis membrane and SW reverse osmosis membrane

机译:BW反渗透膜与SW反渗透膜的初步比较

获取原文

摘要

Two kinds of reverse osmosis (RO) membrane for brackish water (BW) and sea water (SW) respectively were prepared with trimesoyl chloride (TMC) and m-phenylenediamine(MPD) through interfacial polymerization technique on the polysulphone supporting film. They were compared using permeation experiments with salt water, scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) as well as X-ray photoelectronic spectroscopy (XPS) and Atomic force microscopy (AFM). This study has shown that SW RO membrane has higher rejection for NaCl but low flux for water relative to the BW RO membrane, because the surface of SW RO membrane contains more hydrophilic group (-COOH) according to the XPS result and has lower roughness than that of BW RO membrane according to the result of SEM and AFM
机译:通过偏苯三甲酰氯(TMC)和间苯二胺(MPD)通过界面聚合技术在聚砜支撑膜上制备了两种分别用于微咸水(BW)和海水(SW)的反渗透(RO)膜。使用盐水进行渗透实验,扫描电子显微镜(SEM)以及X射线光电光谱(XPS)和原子力显微镜(AFM)对它们进行了比较。这项研究表明,相对于BW RO膜,SW RO膜对NaCl的截留率更高,而对水的通量却较低,这是因为根据XPS结果,SW RO膜的表面含有更多的亲水基团(-COOH),并且粗糙度要比BW RO膜低。 SEM和AFM的结果表明BW RO膜的性能

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号