首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies >Comparison of carbon capture and storage with renewable energy technologies regarding structural, economical, and ecological aspects
【24h】

Comparison of carbon capture and storage with renewable energy technologies regarding structural, economical, and ecological aspects

机译:就结构,经济和生态方面比较可再生能源技术的碳捕集与封存

获取原文

摘要

To use coal in the future in a more environmentally-friendly way, the option of "carbon capture and storage" (CCS) is discussed. A first system-analytic view in the form of a life cycle analysis and a cost assessment combined with a systematic comparison with renewable energies regarding future conditions in the power plant market (2020) was done. The results show that assuming a realistic CO_2 emissions' separation rate of 88% at the power plant results in a greenhouse gas reduction by only 65% to 79%. Therefore it does not seem justified to talk about "CO_2-free" fossil power plants as proposed by industry and policy. Furthermore, renewables will be competitive with electricity from CCS power plants from the beginning of CCS technology in 2020 (wind power) or from 2030 - 2040 (mix of all renewables), depending on the price increase of the fossil fuels.
机译:为了将来以更环保的方式使用煤炭,讨论了“碳捕集与封存”(CCS)选项。进行了以生命周期分析和成本评估的形式进行的第一个系统分析视图,并与可再生能源就电厂市场(2020年)的未来状况进行了系统比较。结果表明,假设发电厂的实际CO_2排放分离率达到88%,则温室气体的排放量仅减少65%至79%。因此,谈论行业和政策建议的“无CO_2”化石电厂似乎没有道理。此外,取决于化石燃料的价格上涨,从2020年CCS技术开始(风力发电)或2030-2040年(所有可再生能源的混合)开始,可再生能源将与CCS电厂的电力竞争。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号