首页> 外文会议>SPE Asia Pacific oil gas conference and exhibition >Reservoir Simulation Challenges for Modeling a Thin Volatile Oil Rim With Large GasCap in the Poleng Field, Kujung-I Oil Reservoir, East Java Basin, Indonesia
【24h】

Reservoir Simulation Challenges for Modeling a Thin Volatile Oil Rim With Large GasCap in the Poleng Field, Kujung-I Oil Reservoir, East Java Basin, Indonesia

机译:在印度尼西亚东爪哇盆地库戎一号油藏,在Poleng油田中,模拟一个大型气顶的薄挥发油边缘的油藏模拟挑战

获取原文

摘要

This paper explores the difficulties in modeling an oil rim witha large gas-cap using black-oil and compositionalformulations. The example is from the Poleng field located inthe Poleng Block, East Java Basin, Indonesia. This reservoiris a reefal carbonate system with a limited aquifer within theKujung-I interval.Production from the field commenced in 1975, wassuspended in 1978 and re-activated by Kodeco in 1998. In2002-03, a full-field study was conducted to re-evaluate theOOIP and OGIP and investigate future development optionssuch as booster compression, gas and/or water injection,workovers, and infill wells. For this study, a new reservoirsimulation model was developed based upon new/updateddata. Two fluid PVT models (modified black oil andcompositional) were also developed. At the start of the study,the operator felt that compositional formulation might beneeded for modeling the gas injection processes. However,most of the work was performed using the modified black oilmodel because of computational speed consideration. Thehistory match process showed that many simulation layers(grid blocks) were required to match the wells near the fluidcontacts. Grouping some components in the compositionalmodel was helpful to reduce run time, but the resultingequations of state (EOS) were generally not reliable for boththe gas-cap and oil zones.Simulation results indicated that an OOIP of 98.5MMSTB was required to obtain a good history match. Theoriginal free gas-in-place was estimated to be 210.1 BSCF.The best future development option was a boostercompression project. For a 10-year prediction period,additional oil and gas recoveries for the booster compressorwere predicted to be about 1.7% OOIP and 19.0% OGIPcompared to the base case. Gas injection was less favorablebecause it would defer some volume of the gas sales, whilewater injection, workover and infill wells resulted in verysmall incremental oil and gas recoveries. The main reasonsfor the low oil recovery are high residual oil saturationsestimated from core analyses, reservoir heterogeneity, and gasfingering from the large gas-cap.
机译:本文探讨了使用以下方法对油边进行建模的困难 使用黑油和成分的大型气顶 配方。该示例来自位于 印度尼西亚东爪哇盆地Poleng区块。这个水库 是礁内碳酸盐岩系统,含水层有限 Kujung-I间隔。 该油田的生产始于1975年,当时 在1978年暂停,并在1998年由Kodeco重新启用。 2002-03年,我们进行了一项全领域研究,以重新评估 OOIP和OGIP并研究未来的开发方案 例如增压压缩,注气和/或注水, 修井和填充井。对于这项研究,一个新的水库 基于新的/更新的开发了仿真模型 数据。两种流体PVT模型(改性黑油和 成分)也得到了发展。在研究开始时, 操作员认为成分配方可能是 气体注入过程建模所需的模型。然而, 大部分工作是使用改性黑油进行的 出于计算速度考虑而建立模型。这 历史匹配过程表明许多模拟层 (网格块)需要匹配流体附近的井 联系人。将成分中的某些成分分组 该模型有助于减少运行时间,但结果 状态方程(EOS)通常对于这两种方法都不可靠 气顶和油区。 仿真结果表明OOIP为98.5 要求MMSTB获得良好的历史记录匹配。这 原始的现场免费气体估计为210.1 BSCF。 未来最好的发展选择是助推器 压缩项目。在10年的预测期内, 增压压缩机的额外油气回收量 预计约为OOIP的1.7%和OGIP的19.0% 与基本情况相比气体注入不太有利 因为这会推迟一定数量的天然气销售,而 注水,修井和填充井导致了 少量的油气回收增量。主要原因 低油采收率是高残留油饱和度 根据岩心分析,储层非均质性和天然气估算 从大油箱盖上弹指。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号