首页> 外文会议>SPE/IADC drilling conference >Reducing Risk and Cost in Diverse Well Construction Applications: EccentricDevice Drills Concentric Hole and Offers a Viable Alternative to Underreamers
【24h】

Reducing Risk and Cost in Diverse Well Construction Applications: EccentricDevice Drills Concentric Hole and Offers a Viable Alternative to Underreamers

机译:降低不同井建设应用中的风险和成本:EccentricDevice钻同心孔并为扩孔器提供了可行的替代方案

获取原文

摘要

Increasingly, operators seek to underream. Whether driven bycementing tolerances, ECD improvements, pore pressurefracture gradients, production increases, swelling shales/saltsor setting sand screens, underreaming is sought after at allstages of field development.To date, the industry has a common perception thatconcentricity can only be delivered through concentric cuttingmechanisms. This paper proves otherwise. The performance,risks and suitability of an eccentric underreaming device arecompared with concentric underreamers. Usage in over 100well sections is tabulated and reviewed to verify the devicedrills concentric hole in differing formations and applications.Pilot bit and underreamer cutter characteristics are matchedfor directional control, durability and hole quality. Specificattention is paid to N Sea & GOM run history covering usagewith push and point-the-bit rotary steerables. In exploratory,deepwater or complex well paths, the device is placed above a3-D rotary steerable and full logging suite. Here the problemof leaving pilot gauge rathole is also addressed. In enhancedRPM, motor directional applications it is placed as nearbit.Computational fluid dynamics, nozzle and PDC cutter layoutsare also discussed with regard to optimizing cuttingsevacuation, hole cleaning, BHA stability and ROP.In conclusion, 20 different well construction activities arepresented and used as a benchmark for the evaluation of therisks and suitability of the device as compared with concentricunderreamers.Some drilling engineers may be surprised by part of thispapers’ title - an eccentric device drills concentric hole andoffers a viable alternative to underreamers - as there is acommon perception that concentric hole can only be attainedthrough concentric cutting mechanisms. Before proving thisperception inaccurate, it is worth defining certain terms. Forthe purposes of this paper, the following terms mean ‘theopening of a well-bore after passing through a restriction’.1. Underreaming2. Hole enlargement3. Reaming while drilling4. Simultaneous underreaming5. Drilling with a bicentre/eccentric bit6. Hole-openingHowever, ‘Hole-openers’ as downhole tools are beyond thescope of this study due to their nature. They have fixed predetermineddiameters and are best suited for top-holeapplications as they can not pass through restrictions orroutinely underream several thousand feet or more’ (Ref 1 &18).The perception surrounding concentricity arises fromdifferences between Eccentric Underreamers (E-UR) andConcentric Underreamers (C-UR).In the case of E-UR, which are integral underreamers orevolutions from bicentre bits, the perception is based on thefollowing:1. Eccentric bits have an unbalanced and eccentriccutting action.2. An unbalanced cutting action is unlikely to result ingood drilling dynamics.3. Therefore, an eccentric cutting action is unlikely toprovide concentric hole.While in the case of C-UR, which have moving parts andevolved from arm-type underreamers, it is essentially:C-UR have a balanced and concentric cutting mechanism.1. A balanced cutting mechanism is likely to result ingood drilling dynamics.
机译:运营商越来越多地寻求不足。是否由 固井公差,ECD改善,孔隙压力 裂缝梯度,产量增加,页岩/盐溶胀 或设置防砂网,根本就不足以寻求扩孔 领域发展的各个阶段。 迄今为止,业界普遍认为 同心只能通过同心切割来实现 机制。本文证明了这一点。表演 偏心扩孔装置的风险和适用性是 与同心扩孔器相比。超过100种用途 列出井孔部分并进行检查以验证设备 在不同的构造和应用中钻同心孔。 先导钻头和扩孔刀的特性是匹配的 用于方向控制,耐用性和孔质量。具体的 注意N Sea和GOM的运行历史,涵盖使用情况 带有推式和尖端旋转式操纵装置。在探索中, 深水或复杂的井道,将设备放置在 3D旋转定向和完整测井套件。这里的问题 还解决了离开先导仪表盘孔的问题。在增强 RPM,在电机定向应用中,它被放置为Nearbit。 计算流体动力学,喷嘴和PDC切割器布局 还讨论了有关优化切割的问题 疏散,孔清洁,BHA稳定性和ROP。 总之,有20种不同的油井建设活动 介绍并用作评估的基准 与同心设备相比,设备的风险和适用性 扩孔器。一些钻井工程师可能会对其中的一部分感到惊讶 论文的标题-偏心装置钻出同心孔并 为欠扩胶剂提供了一种可行的替代方法-因为有一个 普遍认为只能获得同心圆孔 通过同心切割机制。在证明这一点之前 感知不准确,值得定义某些术语。为了 就本文的目的而言,以下术语表示“ 通过限制后打开井眼’。 1.扩孔 2.扩孔 3.钻孔时铰孔 4.同时扩孔 5.用双中心/偏心钻头钻孔 6.开孔 但是,“开孔器”作为井下工具已经超出了 由于其性质,本研究的范围。他们有固定的预定 直径,最适合顶孔 应用程序,因为它们无法通过限制或 通常会在数千英尺或更高的高度上做不到”(参考资料1和 18)。 围绕同心的感知来自于 偏心扩孔器(E-UR)与 同心扩孔器(C-UR)。 对于E-UR,它们是整体扩孔器或 从双中心位演化而来,这种感知是基于 下列的: 1.偏心钻头不平衡且偏心 切割动作。 2.不平衡的切割动作不太可能导致 良好的钻井动力学。 3.因此,偏心切削动作不可能 提供同心孔。 而对于C-UR,它具有运动部件和 从手臂型扩孔器演变而来,它基本上是: C-UR具有平衡且同心的切割机制。 1.平衡的切割机制可能会导致 良好的钻井动力学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号