首页> 外文会议>Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology >Assessing United States County-Level Exposure for Hurricane and Tropical Storm Epidemiological Research
【24h】

Assessing United States County-Level Exposure for Hurricane and Tropical Storm Epidemiological Research

机译:评估美国县级飓风和热带风暴流行病学研究的暴露

获取原文

摘要

Hurricanes and other tropical storms bring severe impacts to U.S. communities. These impacts can result from a variety of storm-related hazards, including extreme wind, rain, flooding, and tornadoes. Epidemiological studies vary widely in how they classify exposure to tropical storms, using various hazard-based metrics and, in some cases, using distance from the storm as a surrogate for exposure to storm-related hazards. Here we measure county-level exposure to hurricanes and tropical storms in the United States based on distance from the storm, maximum sustained wind, rainfall, flooding, and tornadoes for all land-falling or near-passing Atlantic basin storms for 1988—2015. We show that the locations identified as storm-exposed varied substantially when switching among these metrics. For example, most wind-based storm exposures were limited to southern counties near the coast, while flood- and rain-based exposures often extended to inland and northern counties. We also show that distance to the storm served as at best a moderate, and often a poor, surrogate in identifying exposure to storm-related wind, rain, floods, or tornadoes. Therefore, when impact studies use distance as a surrogate of exposure to tropical storm exposures or use one hazard-based metric (e.g., wind-based) when the impact is partly or fully caused by a different storm hazard, the analysis will be prone to exposure misclassification, which can mask true associations, even strong associations. To facilitate future research, we make this multi-hazard storm exposure data available through open-source software.
机译:飓风和其他热带风暴给美国社区带来了严重影响。这些影响可能是由各种与风暴有关的危害引起的,包括极端的风,雨,洪水和龙卷风。流行病学研究使用不同的基于危害的指标对热带风暴的暴露程度进行分类的方法差异很大,在某些情况下,使用距风暴的距离作为暴露于风暴相关危害的替代方法。在此,我们根据1988-2015年所有登陆或接近通过的大西洋海盆风暴的距风暴距离,最大持续风,降雨,洪水和龙卷风的距离,来衡量县级在美国遭受的飓风和热带风暴的影响。我们显示,当在这些指标之间切换时,被确定为暴风雨暴雨的位置会有很大不同。例如,大多数基于风的暴风雨仅限于沿海附近的南部县,而基于洪水和雨水的暴风雨经常扩展到内陆和北部县。我们还表明,与风暴的距离最多只能作为中等程度(通常是较差的)的替代物,以识别暴露于与风暴有关的风,雨,洪水或龙卷风的风险。因此,当影响研究使用距离作为热带风暴暴露的替代指标,或者当影响部分或完全由另一种风暴危害引起时,使用一种基于危害的指标(例如,基于风的指标)时,分析将容易曝光错误分类,可能掩盖真正的联想,甚至是强联想。为了便于将来的研究,我们通过开源软件提供了这种多灾种暴风雨暴露数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号