首页> 外文会议>Intl Competitiveness and Business Techniques in Advanced Optics and Imaging >Role of measurement in determining science and technology policy
【24h】

Role of measurement in determining science and technology policy

机译:测量在确定科学技术政策中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract: The United States clearly needs an explicit policy toward research and development for high technology products and manufacturing processes. Gomory & Schmitt (1988) and Cohen & Zysman (1988) present qualitative arguments that this is so. Our research into the technology of semiconductors, computers, and telecommunication equipment (Norsworthy and Jang, 1992) provides concrete quantitative evidence as well. The costs of research and development and early manufacturing experience coupled with the nearly costless diffusion of the results of these activities, create special economic circumstances in most high technology industries. These circumstances are more complex than economies of scale, but equally powerful in their implications for market behavior. Like economies of scale, these circumstances will favor those organizations and countries whose competitive strategies acknowledge their existence, and most successfully exploit their effects. They involve aspects not only of scale economies, but of public goods, learning curves, the time value of information, and the after tax cost of capital. In this essay we attempt to describe the phenomena and illustrate them by reference to the semiconductor and related industries. It is generally understood that the benefits of research are difficult to capture by the company or industry that undertakes the research; the more basic the research, the more difficult it will generally be for the sponsoring agency to capture its benefits. Therefore, profit- seeking enterprises under conditions of competition will generally undertake less research than would be optimal from the point of view of society as a whole. A number of studies, confirm this general proposition (Griliches, 1987; Mansfield et al., 1982). Their estimates of the overall rate of return to R&D to the whole society is far above the return to private investment in general. These facts have been recognized in federal government policies that encourage research through the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the R&D tax credit, and so forth. !29
机译:摘要:美国显然需要一项针对高科技产品和制造工艺研发的明确政策。 Gomory&Schmitt(1988)和Cohen&Zysman(1988)提出了质的论点,事实就是如此。我们对半导体,计算机和电信设备技术的研究(Norsworthy和Jang,1992)也提供了具体的定量证据。研发和早期制造经验的成本,再加上这些活动的结果几乎无成本的传播,在大多数高科技行业创造了特殊的经济环境。这些情况比规模经济更为复杂,但对市场行为的影响同样强大。像规模经济一样,这些情况将有利于那些竞争战略认可其存在并最成功地发挥其作用的组织和国家。它们不仅涉及规模经济,还涉及公共产品,学习曲线,信息的时间价值和资本的税后成本等方面。在本文中,我们尝试描述这种现象并通过参考半导体及相关行业来说明它们。一般认为,进行研究的公司或行业很难获得研究的好处;研究越基础,赞助机构通常很难获得其收益。因此,在竞争条件下,寻求利润的企业通常进行的研究少于从整个社会的角度进行的最佳研究。大量研究证实了这一一般性主张(Griliches,1987; Mansfield等,1982)。他们对整个社会的研发总回报率的估计远远高于总体上私人投资的回报。这些事实已在联邦政府的政策中得到认可,这些政策鼓励通过国家科学基金会,美国国立卫生研究院,研发税收抵免等进行研究。 !29

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号