首页> 外文会议>International Council for Scientific and Technical Information annual conference. >The Integrated Evaluation about the Academic Impact of Chinese Researchers in Clinical Medical Science Based on Citation Analysis
【24h】

The Integrated Evaluation about the Academic Impact of Chinese Researchers in Clinical Medical Science Based on Citation Analysis

机译:基于引文分析的中国临床医学研究人员学术影响力综合评价

获取原文

摘要

Objective: To provide reference for researcher evaluation, comprehensive assessment for academic impact of researchers in clinical medical science has been done by multiple citation indicators. Methods: A factor analysis model for composite academic impact scores has been constructed for 10 Clinical PhD supervisors from Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Fu Wai Hospital with 7 indicators. And a correlation analysis for the performance of domestic and international academic impact has been done. Results: Two main factors Fl and F2 are extracted from the 7 indicators. The number of publications, total citations, h index and g index are larger load in the F1 main factor, cumulative impact factor is also the larger factor loading for the international academic influence, the average citations number and A index are the larger load on the main factors F2. Comprehensive evaluation scores of domestic academic impact and international academic impact showed moderate correlation. Conclusion: Citation analysis indicators can be classified into two types of factors, one is "total" and the other is "average", with the establishment of integrated academic impact assessment model. The clinical researchers with higher "average" indicator tend to have higher academic impact scores. The domestic academic impact and international academic influence should be assessed separately.
机译:目的:为研究者评估提供参考,通过多种引用指标对研究人员在临床医学领域的学术影响进行综合评估。方法:为中国医学科学院附外医院的10名临床博士生导师建立了综合学术影响力得分的因子分析模型,并采用7项指标。并对国内外学术影响力的表现进行了相关分析。结果:从7个指标中提取了两个主要因素F1和F2。出版物的数量,总被引数,h指数和g指数是F1主要因素的较大负担,累积影响因子也是受国际学术影响力的较大因素,平均被引数和A指数对F1的影响较大。主要因素F2。国内学术影响力和国际学术影响力的综合评价得分显示出中等相关性。结论:通过建立综合的学术影响力评估模型,可以将引文分析指标分为两类因素,一种是“总计”,另一种是“平均”。具有较高“平均”指标的临床研究人员往往具有较高的学术影响力得分。国内学术影响力和国际学术影响力应分开评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号