【24h】

Rational Agents That Blush

机译:脸红的Rational Agent

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A student, supported by his classmates, throws a piece of chalk at the teacher who is writing on the blackboard. The teacher rapidly turns back and promptly catches him in the act. The student blushes and suddenly realizes how bad it was what he did. What happened to the guy? Why did he decide to throw the piece of chalk? And why, after a few seconds, he would have liked that what he did had never happened? Aim of this work is to provide a formal characterization of those emotions that deal with normative reasoning, such as shame and sense of guilt, to understand their relation with rational action and to ground their formalization on a cognitive science perspective. In order to do this we need to identify when agents feel ashamed or guilty and what agents do when they feel so. We will also investigate how agents can induce and silence these feelings in themselves, i.e. the analysis of defensive strategies they can employ. We will argue that agents do have control over their emotions and we will analyze some operations they can carry out on them. After presenting a cognitive model of shame and guilt as social emotions, we will provide a formal representation of them and their dynamics in terms of basic notions such as beliefs, goals and violations, following the rational action approach of [26] [25] [13] and the cognitive approach in [16] [3].
机译:一个学生在同学的支持下,用粉笔在黑板上写字的老师身上扔了一支粉笔。老师迅速回头,迅速抓住了他的行为。学生脸红了,突然意识到自己的所作所为多么糟糕。那家伙怎么了?他为什么决定扔粉笔?为什么在几秒钟后,他会喜欢他从未发生过的事情?这项工作的目的是对那些处理诸如羞耻感和内me感之类的规范推理的情绪进行形式化表征,以了解它们与理性行为的关系,并将其形式化基于认知科学的观点。为此,我们需要确定特工何时感到羞愧或内gui,以及特工何时感到羞愧或内。我们还将调查特工如何在自身中诱发和消除这些感觉,即分析他们可以采用的防御策略。我们将争辩说代理人确实可以控制他们的情绪,并且我们将分析他们可以对情绪进行的一些操作。在介绍了作为社会情感的羞耻和内的认知模型之后,我们将按照[26] [25]的理性行动方法,以基本概念(如信念,目标和侵犯)来正式表示它们及其动态。 13]和[16] [3]中的认知方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号