【24h】

COMPARISON OF ADCP MEASUREMENTS AND 3D LARGE-EDDY-BASED SIMULATIONS OF FLOW IN SMALL, SHALLOW QUITZDORF RESERVOIR

机译:小,浅矩形魁北克水库ADCP测量与基于3D大涡模拟的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

ADCP flow measurements were done at two locations within the shallow, polymictic Quitzdorf Reservoir in Saxony, Germany. Both measured profiles yield time-averaged velocity distributions almost opposed to the recorded wind direction. A three-dimensional barotropic Finite Element model based on an anisotropic Large-Eddy turbulence closure scheme is used to reproduce the flow field. By systematically varying the two major model parameters, the SMAGORINSKY coefficient c_s and the absolute bottom roughness k_s, and by comparing the results to the measurements, two parameter combinations with similarly good results can be found. In either case, the model reproduces the measured velocity profiles very well both in magnitude and in shape, which confirms the performance of the turbulence model and the appropriate choice of boundary conditions. The hydrodynamic model explains the discrepancy between wind and flow directions and thus helps to understand the global circulation pattern in the reservoir for the given meteorological conditions. The ambiguity in choosing the best parameter combination may be attributed to the 2D turbulence structure within the water body.
机译:ADCP流量测量是在德国萨克森州浅的多晶Quitzdorf水库中的两个位置进行的。两种测得的廓线均产生与记录的风向几乎相反的时间平均速度分布。基于各向异性大涡湍流闭合方案的三维正压有限元模型用于再现流场。通过系统地改变两个主要模型参数SMAGORINSKY系数c_s和绝对底部粗糙度k_s,并将结果与​​测量结果进行比较,可以找到具有相似良好结果的两个参数组合。无论哪种情况,该模型都能很好地重现所测得的速度分布,无论是幅度还是形状,这都证实了湍流模型的性能以及对边界条件的适当选择。流体力学模型解释了风向与流向之间的差异,因此有助于了解给定气象条件下储层的整体环流模式。选择最佳参数组合的歧义可归因于水体内的2D湍流结构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号