首页> 外文会议>International conference on electronic measurement instruments;ICEMI' 2009 >Comparative Analysis of Mixing Performance and Pressure Loss of Three Types of Passive Micromixers
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of Mixing Performance and Pressure Loss of Three Types of Passive Micromixers

机译:三种类型的被动式微混合器的混合性能和压力损失的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

Effective mixing of microfluids is the basic requirement for biochemical analysis. The alteration of internal structure and shape of microchannel can increase the interfacial surface areas and then improve the mixing performance. Three types of micromixers with different structures were investigated with numerical simulation.Meanwhile,the mixing performance of 3 types of passive micromixers was compared.Consequently,the pressure loss of the micromixers was studied. The results shows that the mixing performance of the internal-rib micromixers surpasses the other two types of micromixers under 5 different inlet velocity conditions. The pressure loss of the micromixer gradually increases with the flux growth. The pressure loss of internal-rib micromixer is the largest,Z-shaped micromixer takes the second places and Y-shaped micromixer is the least.In particular,when Q is 288mLh'',the pressure loss of micromixer is large,which is not conducive to the integration of microfluidic chips.However,When Q=28.8mL,the internal-rib micromixer with a high mixing efficiency and low pressure loss is able to meet the requirement of microfluidic chips.
机译:有效混合微流体是生化分析的基本要求。微通道内部结构和形状的改变可以增加界面表面积,进而改善混合性能。通过数值模拟研究了三种不同结构的微混合器,同时比较了三种无源微混合器的混合性能,进而研究了微混合器的压力损失。结果表明,在5种不同的入口速度条件下,内肋式微混合器的混合性能优于其他两种类型的微混合器。微型混合器的压力损失随着通量的增长而逐渐增加。内肋式微混合器的压力损失最大,Z型微混合器次之,Y型微混合器最小。特别是当Q为288mLh''时,微混合器的压力损失大,不是然而,当Q = 28.8mL时,具有高混合效率和低压力损失的内肋微混合器能够满足微流体芯片的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号