首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting >SAFETY SYMBOLS IN ANSI AND ISO VOLUNTARY STANDARDS -DO PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THEM?
【24h】

SAFETY SYMBOLS IN ANSI AND ISO VOLUNTARY STANDARDS -DO PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THEM?

机译:ANSI和ISO自愿性标准中的安全符号-人们是否理解它们?

获取原文

摘要

This paper presents the results of two studies which comprehension tested safety symbols inpublished ANSI and ISO voluntary standards. Study 1 tested safety symbols from the ANSIZ535.3 Criteria for Safety Symbols standard. Study 2 tested additional safety symbols from theANSI Z535.3 standard as well as additional symbols from the ISO 7010 safety symbols standard.Overall, comprehension of the symbols in both studies was relatively poor. Only two of thetwelve symbols tested in Study 1 and five of the fourteen symbols tested in Study 2 met ANSIZ535.3 acceptance criteria. Adding red to hazard alerting symbols to depict heat improvedcomprehension, but adding color and determinants to information symbols did not. Implicationsof these results for future revisions of the ANSI Z535.3 standard are discussed.
机译:本文介绍了两项研究的结果,这些研究理解了已发布的ANSI和ISO自愿性标准中的安全符号。研究1从ANSIZ535.3安全符号标准中测试了安全符号。研究2测试了ANSI Z535.3标准中的其他安全符号以及ISO 7010安全符号标准中的其他符号。总体而言,两项研究中对这些符号的理解都相对较差。在研究1中测试的十二个符号中只有两个和在研究2中测试的十四个符号中的五个符合ANSIZ535.3接受标准。在危险警告符号中添加红色以表示热量可提高理解度,但在信息符号中未添加颜色和决定因素。讨论了这些结果对ANSI Z535.3标准的未来修订版的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号