首页> 外文会议>European Distance and E-Learning Network annual conference >ACADEMIC COMMUNICATION VIA TWITTER - THE CASE OF #EDENCHATS
【24h】

ACADEMIC COMMUNICATION VIA TWITTER - THE CASE OF #EDENCHATS

机译:通过推特进行学术交流-以#EDENCHATS为例

获取原文

摘要

The present study tries to offer an overview on the use of Twitter in scholarly communication and will focus on the #EDENchat series, offered on Twitter by EDEN NAP - Network of Academics and Professionals, since 2014. Individual researchers or Institutions may use twitter for several reasons such as advertising their research, events or publications. The use of correct hashtags increase visibility and may help interaction and exchange of ideas. No fully comprehensive studies exist on how and why scholars use Twitter and some of them highlight how little use of Twitter is made among scholars. The other issue described in the study was related to content. In fact, among those using Twitter, they did not necessarily do so for professional reasons: most of them used it just for personal reasons, in fact. It might be that the above negative attitude is connected to the limitation in characters that Twitter imposes. As we all know, Twitter is a form of free micro-blogging which allows users to send and receive short public messages called tweets. Tweets are limited to no more than 140 characters, and can include links to blogs, web pages, images, videos and all other material online. You can start tweeting anytime, from your computer, smart phone or tablet. By following other people and sources you are able to build up an instant, personalized Twitter feed that meets one's full range of interests, both academic and personal. The question is: can a just 140 character academic communication has an impact? This paper tries to answer the question, analysing some aspects of #EDENchat series from 2014 up-to-now.
机译:本研究试图概述Twitter在学术交流中的使用,并将着重于EDEN NAP-学术和专业人员网络自2014年以来在Twitter上提供的#EDENchat系列。个别研究人员或机构可能在多个应用程序中使用twitter广告研究,事件或出版物之类的原因。使用正确的标签可以增加可见性,并可以帮助进行交互和思想交流。目前尚无关于学者如何使用Twitter以及为何使用Twitter的全面综合研究,其中一些研究突显了学者中很少使用Twitter。研究中描述的另一个问题与内容有关。实际上,在使用Twitter的人中,他们不一定出于专业原因这样做:实际上,大多数人只是出于个人原因而使用Twitter。上述负面态度可能与Twitter施加的字符限制有关。众所周知,Twitter是一种免费的微博客形式,允许用户发送和接收称为tweets的简短公共消息。推文最多不能超过140个字符,并且可以包括指向博客,网页,图像,视频和所有其他在线材料的链接。您可以随时通过计算机,智能手机或平板电脑开始发推文。通过关注其他人和消息源,您可以建立一个即时的,个性化的Twitter提要,该提要可以满足一个人的全部兴趣,包括学术和个人兴趣。问题是:仅仅140个字符的学术交流会产生影响吗?本文试图回答这个问题,分析2014年至今的#EDENchat系列。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号