【24h】

Comparing Topiary-Style Approaches to Headline Generation

机译:比较修剪样式的方法来生成标题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper we compare a number of Topiary-style headline generation systems. The Topiary system, developed at the University of Maryland with BBN, was the top performing headline generation system at DUC 2004. Topiary-style headlines consist of a number of general topic labels followed by a compressed version of the lead sentence of a news story. The Topiary system uses a statistical learning approach to finding topic labels for headlines, while our approach, the LexTrim system, identifies key summary words by analysing the lexical cohesive structure of a text. The performance of these systems is evaluated using the ROUGE evaluation suite on the DUC 2004 news stories collection. The results of these experiments show that a baseline system that identifies topic descriptors for headlines using term frequency counts outperforms the LexTrim and Topiary systems. A manual evaluation of the headlines also confirms this result.
机译:在本文中,我们比较了许多Topiary样式的标题生成系统。由BBN在马里兰大学开发的Topiary系统是DUC 2004上表现最好的标题生成系统。Topiary样式的标题由多个常规主题标签以及紧随其后的新闻故事主句组成。 Topiary系统使用一种统计学习方法来查找标题的主题标签,而我们的方法LexTrim系统通过分析文本的词汇衔接结构来识别关键摘要词。使用DUC 2004新闻报道集上的ROUGE评估套件可以评估这些系统的性能。这些实验的结果表明,使用术语频率计数来识别标题的主题描述符的基线系统优于LexTrim和Topiary系统。对标题的手动评估也证实了这一结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号