首页> 外文会议>Ergonomics Society Annual Conference; 200504; Hertfordshire(GB) >PREVENTION OF FALL-INDUCED HIP FRACTURES: USABILITY EVALUATION OF HIP PROTECTORS
【24h】

PREVENTION OF FALL-INDUCED HIP FRACTURES: USABILITY EVALUATION OF HIP PROTECTORS

机译:预防秋天诱发的髋关节骨折:髋关节保护器的可用性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Hip fractures are a common consequence of falls among the older population, with the incidence set to rise as our aging society increases. It has been suggested that the use of hip protectors are instrumental in substantially reducing the occurrence of hip fractures and so reducing the associated risks of disability and death. A serious limitation to their efficacy however, is that of non-use, particularly in the community setting. This paper presents a qualitative interpretation of the usability issues arising from the use of hip protectors and reasons for non-compliance. Two types of hip protectors (soft and hard) were examined to deduce if one was superior to the other on these accounts. The main reasons for non-compliance were: poor comfort; poor self-perceived appearance of the user; and high levels of self perceived safety. The soft hip protectors were found to be superior in terms of usability and compliance, and reported to be significantly more comfortable than the hard hip protectors (p = 0.009).
机译:髋部骨折是老年人口跌倒的常见结果,随着我们老龄化社会的发展,这种情况的发生率将上升。已经提出,使用髋部保护器有助于显着减少髋部骨折的发生,从而减少相关的残疾和死亡风险。然而,其功效的严重局限性是不使用,特别是在社区环境中。本文对使用髋部保护器引起的可用性问题和不合规的原因进行了定性解释。在这些方面,检查了两种类型的髋部保护器(软性和硬性),以推断其中一种优于另一种。违规的主要原因是:舒适度差;用户的自我感觉不良;和高水平的自我感知安全性。发现柔软的髋部保护器在可用性和顺应性方面要优越,并且据报道比硬质的髋部保护器要舒适得多(p = 0.009)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号