首页> 外文会议>Eighth international mining geology conference 2011. >Fundamental Sampling Error and Sampling Precision in Resource Estimation – A Discussion
【24h】

Fundamental Sampling Error and Sampling Precision in Resource Estimation – A Discussion

机译:资源估计中的基本采样误差和采样精度–讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For the sampling of particulate materials in mineral exploration and mining, the fundamentalrnsampling error (FSE) introduced by Gy is a measure of the constitutional heterogeneity of thernsample lot and is expressed as the relative standard deviation of subsample grades of a particularrnmass. The FSE is presently regarded as an important indicator of quality for samples used inrnresource estimation. Constitutional heterogeneity describes an ideal state of heterogeneity withrnrespect to all constituents of the lot such that the fundamental error among subsamples of arnparticular mass is minimised.rnIn this paper, the term ‘sampling precision’ used in relation to mineral resource sampling usuallyrnrefers to a statistic based on the assay results drawn from pairs of separate subsample splits ofrnmultiple sample lots. The pairs of splits are extracted after the lots have been prepared by crushingrnand pulverising to meet specifi ed criteria of grain size and subsample mass. There is presently norngenerally accepted method of calculating the ‘sampling precision’ from such paired data but somernform of the relative standard deviation that is consistent with defi nition of the FSE is preferredrnhere. The work of Thompson and Howarth in the 1970s on geochemical analytical precision, whichrnhas been subjected to extensive examination and criticism by Stanley and Lawie (2007), and thatrnof Francois-Bongar?on since the 1990s forms the background to the discussion in the paper.rnA signifi cant aspect of the application of Gy’s sampling theory to sampling in gold deposits isrnthe requirement that the fundamental error be maintained at less than ±20 per cent. The mostrnimportant reason for this is to ensure that the effects of other sampling errors such as the groupingrnand segregation, and increment delimitation which can cause local and global biases in samplingrnare kept as small as possible.rnThis paper is focused mainly on the quality of sampling in gold deposits and looks at anrnalternative to the use of a constant sampling precision applied to a collection of lots with varyingrnaverage grade. A theoretical model for the FSE based on duplicate sampling is presented and thernsimulated results of the model are compared to practical outcomes of real duplicate pairs drawnrnfrom multiple sample lots. The goal of the work is to present a more informative analysis ofrnduplicate sample data from multiple lots which may allow a more informed view of the potentialrnfor bias generating errors during sample preparation and processing.
机译:对于矿物勘探和开采中的颗粒材料采样,Gy引入的基本采样误差(FSE)是对批量样品的结构异质性的一种度量,并表示为特定批量子样品等级的相对标准偏差。 FSE目前被认为是用于资源估算的样本质量的重要指标。构造异质性描述了相对于批次所有成分的理想异质性状态,从而使非典型质量子样本之间的基本误差降到最低。在本文中,与矿产资源采样有关的术语“采样精度”通常是指基于统计的从多个样本批次的成对的单独子样本分割中得出的测定结果。通过破碎和粉碎制备批次以符合指定的粒度和子样品质量标准后,提取成对的分割。目前,存在从规范配对的数据计算“采样精度”的方法,但此处首选与FSE定义一致的相对标准偏差形式。汤普森(Thompson)和霍华斯(Howarth)在1970年代有关地球化学分析精度的工作受到斯坦利(Stanley)和拉维(Lawie)(2007)的广泛研究和批评,而1990年代以来的弗朗索瓦·邦加隆(Francois-Bongar?on)成为本文讨论的背景。 Gy采样理论在金矿采样中的应用的一个重要方面是要求将基本误差保持在±20%以下。这样做的最重要的原因是要确保其他采样错误(如可能导致局部和全局偏差的分组和分离以及增量定界)的影响保持尽可能小。本文主要关注样本的质量。金矿床,并替代使用恒定采样精度应用于具有不同平均品位的一批拍卖品。提出了基于重复抽样的FSE理论模型,并将该模型的模拟结果与从多个样本批次中抽取的真实重复对的实际结果进行了比较。这项工作的目的是对来自多个批次的重复样品数据进行更详尽的分析,从而可以更全面地了解样品制备和处理过程中可能产生偏差的潜在误差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号