【24h】

Comparison of FFT and LMS applied to photoacoustic signal detection

机译:FFT和LMS在光声信号检测中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Photoacoustic measurements are quite often performed by means of data acquisition systems that collect samples of the photoacoustic signal, and use the samples for the purpose of calculation of the amplitude of its fundamental frequency. The most common method of such calculations is the FFT, but the amplitude can be also obtained by means of the least mean square (LMS) method. The paper compares properties of both methods from the point of view of their numerical efficiency and errors vs. S/N ratio and number of samples per period of the investigated signal. The discussion shows that in the case of an integer number of periods sampled, results of the FFT and LMS are identical, but due to higher numerical efficiency the LMS method should be used.
机译:通常,通过数据采集系统来执行光声测量,该数据采集系统收集光声信号的样本,并将这些样本用于计算其基频的幅度。这种计算最常见的方法是FFT,但振幅也可以通过最小均方(LMS)方法获得。本文从数值效率,误差与信噪比,被调查信号的每个周期的样本数,数值效率的角度比较了这两种方法的特性。讨论表明,在采样的周期为整数的情况下,FFT和LMS的结果相同,但由于数值效率较高,因此应使用LMS方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号