【24h】

Heat flow and the structure of Precambrian lighosphere

机译:热流和前寒武纪的碳圈结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Studies of heat fow from Percambriam terrains have demonstrated three empirical relationships; a temporal relationship between heat flow and tectonic age, a spatial pattern between heat flow and the proximity of Archean cratons, and a temporal relationship between heat flow and the age of lithosphere stabilization. In the first relationship, heat flow is inversely related to tectonic age. The second pattern is characterized by low heat flow from Archean cratons and Proterozoic terrains adjacent to cratonic margins (pericratonic terrins), and higher heat flow from Proterozoic terrains that are more than a few hundred kilometers from a craton. In the third pattern, heat flow decreases as the age of stabilization of the lithosphere increases. A number of interpretations of Precambrian heat flow have been offered to explain one or more of these relationships. The simple cooling of a thermal boundary layer predicts essentially no change in heat flow in terrains older than approx 1.5 Ga, and therefore does not likely provide a comprehensive framework for the interpretation of Precambrian hgeat flow. By contrast, two other interpretations, (1) thicker lighosphere beneath Archean terrains than beneath Proterozoic terrains, and (2) greater heat production in Proterozoic crust than in Archean crust, when combined with the special structural configuration of sutures, can both contribute to the spatial and temporal heat flow distributions. Xenolith thermobarometry constraints on lithospheric temperatures, however, limit the contribution of age-dependent crustal heat production, and therefore at least part of the heat flow distributions derive from variations in lithosphere thickness.
机译:对Percambriam地形的热流的研究表明了三个经验关系。热流与构造年龄之间的时间关系,热流与太古代克拉通附近的空间格局以及热流与岩石圈稳定年龄之间的时间关系。在第一个关系中,热流与构造年龄成反比。第二种模式的特征是来自古克拉通和克拉通边缘附近的元古代地形的热流较低,而距克拉通超过几百公里的元古代地形的热流较高。在第三种模式中,热流随着岩石圈稳定年龄的增加而减小。提供了前寒武纪热流的多种解释来解释这些关系中的一个或多个。热边界层的简单冷却基本上预测不到约1.5 Ga以上的地形中的热流没有变化,因此不可能为解释前寒武纪的岩浆流提供全面的框架。相比之下,另外两种解释是:(1)与缝线的特殊结构相结合时,(1)Archean地形下的胶质层比元古代的地形更厚;(2)与缝质的相比,元古代地壳的发热量大于Archean地壳。时空热流分布。然而,Xenolith热压法对岩石圈温度的限制限制了随年龄变化的地壳热量产生的作用,因此,至少部分热流分布来自岩石圈厚度的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号