首页> 外文会议>Conference on Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XXI pt.2; 20040223-20040224; Santa Clara,CA; US >Necessity of Chemical Edge Bead Removal in Modern Day Lithographic Processing
【24h】

Necessity of Chemical Edge Bead Removal in Modern Day Lithographic Processing

机译:现代光刻技术中去除化学边缘珠粒的必要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Some form of edge bead removal (EBR) is one of the standard requirements for a lithographic process. Without any intervention, resist may accumulate at the edge of the wafer at up to several times the nominal thickness of the resist. In addition to this edge bead, the resist is likely to wrap around the wafer contaminating the backside of the wafer as well. It's needless to say that such a condition would present a significant contamination risk not only for the resist track and the exposure tool but for process equipment outside of lithography as well. Two not necessarily exclusive strategies have been used in the past for edge bead removal. One is topside chemical EBR where solvent is dispensed on the edge of the wafer as the wafer is rotated immediately after coating, and the other method is where a ring of exposed resist is formed by subjecting the resist on the outer edges of the wafer to a broadband exposure; also know as wafer-edge exposure (WEE). The advantage of the chemical method is that it will remove the photo resist but also the organic anti-reflective coating (ARC), which is not photosensitive. The disadvantage of this method is obvious as any latitude in tool tolerances or imperfections on the wafer will result in solvent dispense to the undesirable areas of the wafer. While the optical method is much cleaner, its main disadvantage is that it will not remove ARC. As the feature size and die size shrink, there is less and less repairable redundancy on modern semiconductor chips. An observed effect in our manufacturing facility has been an increased sensitivity to tool imperfections and a quantifiable level of yield loss due to solvent splashing for the 140 nm generation. Accounting for the fact that the ARC layer is generally an order of magnitude thinner than the resist layer, yield-maximizing setup of edge bead removal for one lithographic layer and complete removal of topside chemical EBR is discussed in detail in this paper as well as the extension of the same principle to maximize yield at other layers.
机译:某种形式的边缘微珠去除(EBR)是光刻工艺的标准要求之一。在没有任何干预的情况下,抗蚀剂可能会以高达抗蚀剂标称厚度几倍的量积聚在晶圆边缘。除了该边缘珠以外,抗蚀剂还可能包裹在晶片周围,也污染晶片的背面。不用说,这种情况不仅会给抗蚀剂轨道和曝光工具带来危险,而且还会给光刻术之外的处理设备带来严重的污染风险。过去已经使用两种不一定排他的策略来去除边缘珠子。一种是顶侧化学EBR,在涂覆后立即旋转晶片时,在晶片的边缘上将溶剂分配到晶片的边缘,另一种方法是通过对晶片外边缘的抗蚀剂进行光固化形成裸露的抗蚀剂环。宽带暴露;也称为晶圆边缘曝光(WEE)。化学方法的优势在于,它不仅可以去除光致抗蚀剂,而且还可以去除非感光性的有机抗反射涂层(ARC)。该方法的缺点是显而易见的,因为任何工具公差范围或晶圆上的缺陷都会导致溶剂分配到晶圆的不良区域。尽管光学方法更加清洁,但其主要缺点是无法去除ARC。随着特征尺寸和管芯尺寸的缩小,现代半导体芯片上的可修复冗余越来越少。在我们的制造工厂中,观察到的效果是提高了对工具缺陷的敏感性,并且由于140 nm世代的溶剂飞溅而导致了可量化的成品率损失。考虑到ARC层通常比抗蚀剂层薄一个数量级的事实,在本文中详细讨论了ARC层的厚度最大化,用于一个光刻层的边缘珠粒去除的产率最大化设置以及顶部化学EBR的完全去除的事实。扩展相同原理,以最大化其他层的产量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号