首页> 外文会议>Computer vision and image analysis of art II >X-ray image analysis of Lorenzo Lotto's Husband and wife
【24h】

X-ray image analysis of Lorenzo Lotto's Husband and wife

机译:洛伦佐·乐透的丈夫和妻子的X射线图像分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Underdrawings and pentimenti reveal intermediate states of a painting and thus may shed light on the working methods of some artists. It has been claimed that Lorenzo Lotto used optical projections during the execution of Husband and wife (1543) and, recently, that underdrawings in that work might reveal evidence of tracing of optical projections. We analyze x-ray images of this painting-captured under careful, museum-laboratory conditions and enhanced through digital image processing-with special attention to the possibility of evidence of the use of optical projections in the central passage of the depicted carpet. We also study the work in situ and in high-resolution macro optical images of the central portion of the carpet pattern. These photographs reveal that the top portion of the keyhole pattern is not "blurry, like an out-of-focus image," but instead was merely executed in a somewhat broader brush than was neighboring passages. Furthermore, x-ray, infra-red and visible light inspection show that the white portions and black contours were executed atop a broad layer of dark red and reveal no record of an optical projection would have been present when Lotto executed the visible portion. As such, an evidence of putative underdrawings in this region has no bearing on the optical projection claim. There is no evidence of tracing marks-in charcoal or in any medium-in the top, visible portion of this passage either. As such, this visual, infra-red and x-ray evidence does not support the claim that this painting was executed under optical projections. We also discuss the difficulties with the projection theory with special reference to Lotto's preparatory drawing in the Rijksmuseum-specifically the need for a needlessly complex optical system (two lenses rather than one). We also review briefly contemporary textual evidence in early 16th-century Venice that has been used to support the optical projection claim for Lotto and conclude that it also fails to support the projection claim for this painting.
机译:缩图和下垂可以揭示绘画的中间状态,因此可以阐明某些艺术家的工作方法。据说洛伦佐·洛托(Lorenzo Lotto)在处死丈夫和妻子期间(1543)使用了光学投影,最近,该作品中的欠款可能揭示了光学投影的踪迹。我们分析了在精心的博物馆实验室条件下捕获的这幅画的X射线图像,并通过数字图像处理对其进行了增强-特别注意所描绘地毯中央通道中使用光学投影的证据的可能性。我们还研究了地毯图案中央部分的原位和高分辨率宏观光学图像。这些照片表明,锁孔图案的顶部不是“模糊,像散焦图像一样”,而是仅以比相邻通道更宽的笔刷执行。此外,X射线,红外和可见光检查显示,白色部分和黑色轮廓在深红色的较宽层上执行,并且显示当乐透执行可见部分时不会出现光学投影的记录。这样,在该区域中假定的底蚀的证据与光学投影要求无关。也没有证据表明在该通道的顶部可见部分中发现了木炭或任何介质中的痕迹。因此,这种视觉,红外和X射线证据不支持有关此画是在光学投影下执行的说法。我们还将特别参考国立博物馆中乐透的预备图来讨论投影理论的困难,特别是对不必要的复杂光学系统(两个镜头而不是一个镜头)的需求。我们还简要回顾了16世纪初期威尼斯用于支持乐透的光学投影要求的当代文字证据,并得出结论,它也未能支持这幅画的投影要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号