【24h】

Analysis of the Coordinate Differences caused by Different Methods to align the Combined EUREF Solution to the ITRf

机译:分析将EUREF组合解决方案与ITRf对齐的不同方法导致的坐标差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The station coordinates in the weekly combined EUREF SINEX solution are the main product of the EUREF Permanent Network (EPN). However, these weekly solutions are not consistent in time because the underlying reference frame has changed several times throughout the years. When re-aligning each of the EUREF SINEX solutions to the ITRF2000 using the minimum constraint approach, the vertical component of the station coordinates changes at the cm-level. This coordinate change finds its origin in a bug in a subroutine correcting the Earth tides in the Bernese GPS software. This bug affected the vertical component of the weekly EUREF solution with an annual periodicity reaching peak-to-peak 2.8 cm for a typical EPN station like Brussels. While this annual period is clearly seen in the coordinates of the combined EUREF solution, it fades in the minimally constrained solution because it is absorbed by the underlying Helmert transformation.
机译:每周结合的EUREF SINEX解决方案中的测站坐标是EUREF永久网络(EPN)的主要产品。但是,这些每周的解决方案在时间上是不一致的,因为多年来这些基础参考框架已发生了数次更改。使用最小约束方法将每个EUREF SINEX解决方案重新调整为ITRF2000时,测站的垂直分量会在cm级别上变化。这种坐标变化的起源是在子程序中的一个错误中找到的,该错误在Bernese GPS软件中纠正了地球潮汐。该漏洞影响了每周EUREF解决方案的垂直部分,对于像布鲁塞尔这样的典型EPN站,其年周期性达到峰峰值2.8 cm。尽管在合并的EUREF解决方案的坐标中可以清楚地看到这一年期,但由于受基础Helmert变换的吸收,它在最小约束解决方案中逐渐消失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号