首页> 外文会议>CIGRE Lisbon Symposium >A status review of regulatory approaches to smart electricity networks across Europe
【24h】

A status review of regulatory approaches to smart electricity networks across Europe

机译:欧洲智能电网监管方法现状回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As a result of three years work in the field of smart electricity grids and their regulation, the priorities and recommendations of European Energy Regulators include (i) encouraging co-operation amongst stakeholders and identifying possible barriers to smart grid deployment; (ii) ensuring dissemination of the results and lessons learned from demonstration projects financed by network tariffs to all interested parties; (iii) evaluating the breakdown of costs and benefits of possible demonstration projects for each network stakeholder and to take decisions or give advice to decision-makers based on societal cost-benefit assessment which takes into account costs and benefits for each stakeholder and for the society as a whole; (iv) pursuing regulation of outputs as a mechanism to ensure value for money for network users and investigating metrics for the quantification of the most important output effects and benefits at national level.rnIn line with such recommendations, the Council of European Energy Regulators (CEER) prepared in 2011 a “Status review of regulatory approaches to smart electricity grids”, which reviewed (i) regulatory challenges related to smart grids; (ii) innovation and demonstration projects; (iii) cost benefit analyses for the demonstration and deployment of smart grids; (iv) potential performance indicators and incentive schemes for regulating network outputs.rnAccording to the answers to the preparatory survey for the 2011 Status Review, the challenge of dealing with incentives to improve cost-effectiveness was identified (and/or commented on) by most of the countries. The following three challenges also generated a significant reaction from the National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs):rn1. rnhow to encourage network operators to choose innovative solutions;rn2. rnthe inadequacy of existing standards or lack of standards on smart-grid technology; andrn3. rnthe need to enhance the definition of national objectives and policies at political level.rnAccording to the answers to the survey, a significant number of countries indicated that they use some of the 34 potential performance indicators (output effects) for transmission and distribution networks which were identified in the 2010 Conclusions Paper on Smart Grids. This can be either for monitoring purposes, as a minimum requirement, or as a revenue driver. In particular, the indicators for continuity of supply (quality of supply) and the indicators related to losses (efficiency) are used as revenue drivers in more than half of the countries.
机译:由于在智能电网及其监管领域进行了三年的工作,欧洲能源监管机构的优先事项和建议包括:(i)鼓励利益相关者之间的合作,并确定智能电网部署的可能障碍; (ii)确保将由网络资费资助的示范项目的结果和经验教训传播给所有有关方面; (iii)根据社会成本效益评估评估每个网络利益相关者可能的示范项目的成本和收益明细,并为决策者提供决策或建议,其中要考虑到每个利益相关者和社会的成本和收益整体上(iv)实行输出监管,以确保网络用户物有所值,并研究量化国家一级最重要的产出效应和收益的指标。rn根据这些建议,欧洲能源监管者理事会(CEER) )在2011年编写了“智能电网监管方法的状态审查”,其中审查了(i)与智能电网有关的监管挑战; (ii)创新和示范项目; (iii)演示和部署智能电网的成本效益分析; (iv)调节网络产出的潜在绩效指标和激励计划。rn根据对2011年状态评估的准备性调查的答案,大多数人发现(和/或评论)应对激励措施以提高成本效益的挑战。国家。以下三个挑战也引起了国家监管机构(NRA)的重大反应:rn1。如何鼓励网络运营商选择创新解决方案; 2。现有标准不足或缺乏智能电网技术标准; Andrn3。 rn需要在政治层面上加强对国家目标和政策的定义。rn根据调查的答案,许多国家表示它们将34项潜在绩效指标(产出效应)用于输配电网络,其中包括在2010年智能电网结论文件中确定。这既可以作为监视目的(作为最低要求),也可以作为收入来源。特别是,在一半以上的国家中,供应连续性指标(供应质量)和与损失相关的指标(效率)被用作收入驱动因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号