【24h】

Turning the Titanic: Three Case Histories in Cultural Change

机译:转向泰坦尼克号:文化变革的三个案例历史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While incomplete, in the sense that the above case histories are still "works in progress," we can draw some important lessons from the experiences: 1. Organizational change does not equate to cultural change ― Merely moving people around does not alter that way they think and act. Further, organizational changes made without evaluating the safety implications (i.e., loss of job expertise in critical positions) can and will compromise overall safety management. 2. Cultural change must address fundamental business problems ― Cultural change must have a driver. In all of the case histories discussed above, there had been accidents, resulting in concerns by either top management, nearby communities, or outside investors. 3. Change requires action, not just words ― By taking action, as in Case Histories 2 and 3, management made it apparent to the workforce that they were serious about implementing change. Too many "programs du jour" have come and gone without fostering substantive change. Cultural change must be visibly supported. 4. There must be a plan, and a rollout ― Cultural change can't just be announced, or declared. It involves commitment and buy-in from all. Patience is required as well. It will take time for anti-PSM habits and behaviors to completely disappear. 5. Cultural change requires a committed top management ― This has long been seen as synonymous with successful PSM. In many cases, new managers have assumed important positions without understanding the role that PSM plays in their business. Ongoing management education is essential. 6. Organizations have inertia ― Organizations are like great ships. Their course cannot be quickly changed, and management should not wait until the iceberg is just off the bow to begin the course correction. Cultural change cannot be implemented rapidly, and management must be diligent in monitoring the health of the process safety management culture to ensure that corrections are implemented before problems arise. One final lesson implied in each of the case histories is that cultural change must be evergreen... that is, it is an evolutionary process. It must have the seeds for its perpetuation embedded into the process. Effective PSM systems are in constant need of justifying resources for preventing accidents that never happened. For ineffective systems, the justification is self-evident.
机译:尽管并不完整,但从上述案例历史仍在“进行中”的意义上讲,我们可以从经验中汲取一些重要的教训:1.组织变革并不等同于文化变革-仅仅让人们四处走动不会改变他们的方式思考和行动。此外,在未评估安全隐患的情况下进行的组织更改(即,关键职位的专业知识的流失)会并且将会损害整体安全管理。 2.文化变革必须解决根本的业务问题―文化变革必须有动力。在以上讨论的所有案例历史中,都发生过事故,导致高层管理人员,附近社区或外部投资者的担忧。 3.变革需要采取行动,而不仅仅是言词―通过采取行动(如案例历史2和案例3),管理层向员工表明,他们很认真地实施变革。在没有促进实质性改变的情况下,太多的“日程计划”来了又去。文化变革必须得到明显支持。 4.必须有一个计划,并且要推出―文化变革不能仅仅宣布或宣布。它涉及所有人的承诺和支持。也需要耐心。反PSM习惯和行为完全消失需要时间。 5.文化变革需要坚定的高层管理人员―长期以来,这一直被视为成功的PSM的代名词。在许多情况下,新经理在担任重要职务时并不了解PSM在其业务中所扮演的角色。持续的管理教育至关重要。 6.组织具有惯性―组织就像大船。他们的路线不能迅速改变,管理层不应该等到冰山即将来临时才开始纠正路线。文化变革不能迅速实施,管理人员必须勤勉地监控过程安全管理文化的健康状况,以确保在出现问题之前进行纠正。每个案例历史所隐含的最后一课是,文化变革必须是常绿的……也就是说,这是一个进化的过程。它必须将其持久性的种子嵌入到过程中。有效的PSM系统始终需要证明资源合理性,以防止从未发生的事故。对于无效的系统,理由是不言而喻的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号