首页> 外文会议>Advances in cement analysis and concrete petrography >Thinking Outside the Petrographic Box: Application of Petrographic Techniques to Investigation of Failure between Composites of Cement-Based and Non-Cement-Based Materials
【24h】

Thinking Outside the Petrographic Box: Application of Petrographic Techniques to Investigation of Failure between Composites of Cement-Based and Non-Cement-Based Materials

机译:岩石学领域之外的思考:岩石学技术在水泥基和非水泥基复合材料之间的破坏研究中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For more than a century, the construction industries have utilized petrographic techniques to evaluate the composition, characteristics, and quality of concrete, mortar, and other hydraulic cement-based construction materials. The analysis is performed under ASTM C856-18a, Standard Practice for Petrographic Examination of Hardened Concrete. This method provides a guideline for the examination and analysis of concrete (or mortar) to describe composition and characteristics of the mineral constituents and, in some circumstances, to investigate the causes of distress. Although the practice historically is based on visual and microscopical techniques, it allows the petrographer freedom to design the study to meet the needs of the investigation. The practice allows for the use of nonmicroscopical techniques to supplement the study. Such ancillary techniques may include X-ray spectrometry, computer-assisted imaging and analysis, and a variety of inorganic and organic chemical analyses. Such ancillary methods have been used successfully in conjunction with traditional petrographic examinations to investigate characteristics and properties of the concrete and to determine the use or omission of specified constituents or additives. Petrographic techniques, traditionally used for the study of cementitious materials, have been applied to the study of failures of bonded materials, such as coatings, adhesives, and other surface-applied materials that may or may not be cementitious in nature. In these investigations, it is not uncommon that microscopical techniques are supplemented by one or more ancillary techniques to properly determine the causes or contributing factors to failure. This paper includes three case studies in which we determined the explanations for failure between two or more separate materials only through the combination of microscopy and other ancillary techniques. The issues of whether such study of composite systems, not entirely composed of cementitious materials, can be said to have been performed in accordance with all or a portion of ASTM C856 are discussed.
机译:一个多世纪以来,建筑行业一直使用岩相学技术来评估混凝土,砂浆和其他基于水硬性水泥的建筑材料的组成,特性和质量。该分析是根据ASTM C856-18a(硬化混凝土的岩相检验标准实践)进行的。该方法为检查和分析混凝土(或砂浆)提供了指南,以描述矿物成分的组成和特性,并在某些情况下调查引起事故的原因。尽管历史上这种做法是基于视觉和微观技术的,但它使岩学家可以自由地设计研究以满足研究的需要。该实践允许使用非显微技术来补充研究。这样的辅助技术可以包括X射线光谱分析,计算机辅助成像和分析以及各种无机和有机化学分析。这种辅助方法已成功地与传统的岩相学检查结合使用,以研究混凝土的特性和性能,并确定特定成分或添加剂的使用或省略。传统上用于研究胶结材料的岩相照相技术已用于研究粘结材料的破坏,例如涂料,胶粘剂和其他可能是胶结性的或非胶结性的表面施加的材料。在这些研究中,通常会用一种或多种辅助技术来补充显微技术,以正确地确定故障的原因或成因。本文包括三个案例研究,其中我们仅通过显微镜和其他辅助技术的结合来确定两种或多种不同材料之间失效的解释。可以说是否可以对这样的复合系统(不是完全由胶结材料组成)进行研究是根据全部或部分ASTM C856进行的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号